SC2 skill "action latency" & "actions per minute"

I say APM matters just as much as the way which you spend it. Efficiency which is at least partly strategy related, and which is why the player with the highest APM doesn’t always win.

That’s no hyperbole, but direct ingame examples. Alphastar has played on the ladder, the insane AI is available to whoever can start a custom game. No hypothesis here, Alphastar is superior to the regular AI despite a lower APM cap, there is no denying it.

You can keep arguing if you want though.

Why my bubble ? If SC2 players are conceited about something compared to MOBA or other type of strategy games, it’s precisely not about strategics, but about their APM. Never read players arguing how LoL could be played with 80 APM whereas SC2 could require 300 or 500 ?

I’m not among those. I’m low APM in fact, though the absence of spam makes the result lower than the opponent would suppose (at least they told me so).
If you check the post of my smurfs threads, there are screens of a 200+ APM player we’ll call “smurf OK” , super fast reacted. He was twice as fast as me, and playing at a level vastly inferior to his. So he got confident, and did not scout. Guess what ? Reacting in half a second instead of one, and boasting twice the APM of the opponent didn’t change the fact his reaper couldn’t give him the info before being produced and crossing the map. APM don’t change the fact a reaper scout will be later than an SCV one. And so, by the time he saw the problem, the marines were already at his ramp. He then made a second tactical mistake, and from there no matter the mechanical superiority, he still lost miserably. Tactics, my friend.

So yeah, past some point, APM can only do so much if you let yourself get placed into a tactical deadlock. No hyperbole either, just real ingame footage. :slight_smile:

As for the psychiatric accusations, can’t you just debate normally ? We’re just sharing thoughts here, there’s no hot balance considerations, no one’s honor at stake. I didn’t even know who you were at the start of this debate, and I’m not particularly hostile to you. Why would your argumentations require ad hominem in the first place ?

1 Like