https://drop.sc/replay/19253785
1 proton > 2 zerp
Congrats on beating Nuero the other day. He opened 2 base speed roach then you trapped his speedroaches with your slowroaches by pulling your drones to the side at the third. He then took a bunch of bad fights in the open from a lower roach count. He could never find a time to make drones and catch up in eco since he was behind in roaches.
He still could have won despite messing up the timing (when you have roach speed but you’re the one getting surrounded, you’re doing something wrong). He tried to counter-attack but took bad fights at the same time. He needed to back up onto the high ground and stall more using ravagers while his counter attacks went on.
I think it’s pretty clear he isn’t anywhere near as good as he used to be. He’s, what, 5k mmr? Yeah Nuero is really bad these days.
Personally I would have added on Zergling speed and started pumping lots of ravagers with my gas. If you get a decent surround you can completely wreck a superior roach count with biles, and your ability to counter-attack is much greater. Basically he has no choice except to leave roaches behind at his third, which helps level out his roach count advantage. There’s also the possibility of doing a base-trade, and also the ling speed can just catch people off guard and kill a base of drones and instant win the game. Ravagers are also really good at a stalling, which couples well with the counter-attack potential for lings. You can, for example, buy time slowing his roach push down at choke points using biles, while your lings shred a mineral line then regroup with the lings and engage.
I haven’t played in months and I still know ZvZ better than Nuero does.
Why are you talking to yourself
6 Likes
Tell us a single thing that you are not able to do better than X, Y, Z.
From a guy that at 10 Years old was in university and was solving Differential Equations with Partial Derivatives everything can be expected.
Next BatZ will publish his General Solution to the Three Body problem…
3 Likes
Chemistry, biology, physiology. I haven’t studied the first two in a decade, I have never studied the latter. I would say my understanding is definitely better than a layperson but knowing 2+2=4 puts you above the layman.
I see, so let me understand, you are expert in Theoretical Physics, Mathematics (Field Medal). Astrophysics, General Medicine, Philosophy, Comparative History of Religions (Mircea Eliade comes to mind), Anthropology, Nanotechnology and finaly …Theosophy.
Sorry, the disciplines i mentioned are just the half of what you posses (removing Chemistry, biology, physiology).
Orbital dynamics are very simple but they are very sensitive to initial conditions due to being chaotic systems. So you can’t solve for a general case solution, but you can simulate them.
I have programmed smoothed particle dynamics astophysical simulations with the addition of gravity, heat, and matter type. This is someone else, but it’s similar to this:
The initial burst at the start of his simulation is due to his placement parameters exceeding the density parameter of the SPH equations. You have to place the particles for the starting conditions of the simulation and if you place them too closely it causes a repelling force at the very start.
I have faith in YOU Mt. BatZ, 3-body problem is a special case of the n-body problem.
You don’t have to waste your time to solve the 3-body when you can catch the bull from the horns and solve …the n-body.
Otherwise the time that you will spent in thsoe forums will suffer.
What can we do without a BatZ (that is the Newton and Poincare at the same time)? Will you let us only with the other freak - Playa that last month filed the Patent Nr. 130230232323 for the invention of the wheel and fire.?
You can’t solve unsolvable problems. Any chaotic system is highly sensitive to the starting conditions and to the precision of the running parameters. You can’t know the starting conditions with enough accuracy, and even if you could, you would need infinite precision for your running parameters. Calculating even a single operation to infinite precision is quite literally unsolvable, and you’re going to have to make billions of these calculations to solve an N-body problem.
In a typical chaotic system, increasing the accuracy of your starting parameters by 1,000,000x will only increase the duration of your simulation by 3x (before it becomes unstable or inaccurate). So yes if you want to solve for an N-body problem for long time periods, you need infinite precision.
You can make these simulations for the general purpose of studying their behavior, but their predictive power is near zero since it’s so easy to diverge from even a minute difference in the starting conditions.
LOL, i know all that, but nothing is impossible for our resident BatZ. You should publish your own dictionary where the word “impossible” will be defined:
-Something that humanity can’t do/achieve …except batZ.
The problem is self referential logic. The interaction between two N bodies is determined by their position, which then alters their position. So to solve for the end-state you have to know the state of every point between the start state and end state, and you have to know it to infinite precision. So it’s quite literally impossible to solve.
It’s literally identical to Russel’s Paradox: Does the set of all sets that don’t contain themselves, contain itself? So this is a set that contains sets that don’t contain themselves. It is a set as well, which means it must contain itself IF it doesn’t contain itself. Do you see the problem? The logic concludes it must contain itself and that it must not contain itself: If it doesn’t contain itself then it must because then it, itself, is a set that doesn’t contain itself, but if it does contain itself then it can no longer contain itself. It’s an unsolvable problem due to the self-referential logic.
The N-body problem is also self referential.
Let’s be Frank, though, when Terran was Batz public enemy number 1, you couldn’t wait to stroke his ego.
1 Like
Yet you watch Neuro.
Ever heard the golden phrase: “He is a SOB, buy he is OUR SOB”.
A rottweiler (BatZ) is useful as far as he mauls the burglars (whineterrans), the moment the rottweiler attacks the household he is to be disposed off.
BatZ ate the washing-machine and peed and pooed at the Carpet, he will be disciplined.
One in a million odds - no joke. I am normally very busy and had 10 minutes of downtime and nothing available to do except watch something on my phone.
The only thing I am thinking as I watch other people play is “that’s a mistake” and “this person has no idea what they are talking about” and “how on Earth did this guy get into Grandmaster” and “these casters are silver league and probably 80 iq”. So really it’s just a frustrating experience which is why I don’t do it very often.