How to beat a Pro-Zerg that has 500APM while using 150APM:
I donāt like how he doesnāt play pvt. He just leaves. Thatās pretty dumb. Canāt watch his stream. He doesnāt play pvp either does he?
It depend on the day. Usually he leaves only PvP (sometimes).
I would surmise itās a very rare occurrence, to which there would be some news surrounding the subject.
The original story was kind of picked apart to the point where it sounds like his older sister was babysitting him while the professor let him stay in the classroom, not on a roster or by any credentials.
History is full of people that have shown precocious talent and signs of genius. Unfortunately BatZ has only self-promotion and hyperbolic boasting that would be OK with a Perelman (Poincare conjecture and Field-Prize - equivalent of Nobel Prize in mathematics) or a Fermi.
History has that the mathematics teacher of the then 6-7 Year old Gauss gave the following exercise to the class in order to keep the class bussy and be left alone for the whole hour:
Find the sum of the following series: 1+2+3+4+ā¦+99+100.
In less than 5 minutes Gauss stood up and said: I have the solution!
The teacher knowing that doing 99 additions would take much more time than 5 minutes (they had just studied a month ago the 4 basic opperations -adittion, substraction, multiplication and division) was sure that he was wrongā¦
He wasnāt.
It would simply be in Batz best interest to accept opinions and facts he doesnt agree with as valid from time to time. The inability of Batz to say āI can see where youāre coming but disagree becauseā¦ā would do him wonders. Giving no respect to anyone he talks to is what makes it insufferable to have a discussion with him.
More than that!
I am convinced he just googles names of scientific field of inquiry, and blasts them on his posts, to posture as more educated than he could possibly be.
He clearly has no clue of what he is talking about, the vast majority of the time, yet types with such assurity, a passerby would get impressed to the point of claiming it whimsical parody.
Yea, i always suspected that. Only test is a face to face exchange when one has not the benefit ofā¦Google.
My suspicion deepened when our BatZ with polyhedric expertise was able to deal with the three-body-problem as if that issue was his 24/7 job.
That is known to people with theoretical physics background but for 99% of people with STEM background itās just one of the hundred unsolved/unsolvable problems of those last 300-400 years.
No way someone with computer-science background can go to that detail just by his pure memory without checking thick-books orā¦Google.
Itās just a chad almanac, thatās all.
Dumbass, I donāt need to feed to your troll, I donāt have to prove anything to you since I donāt have to adopt definitions and notations from any random comp sci textbook and say itās math problem, doesnāt make you smart while you at the same time reject math:
You can very much be educated and at the same time dumb, like there are creationists biologists, and thatās you. Tbh I havenāt ever met this kind of dumb people and you are my very first one, thatās why Iām assigning you the title of the stupidiest person I have ever met.
Tbh I donāt doubt thatās the case either, but you can be educated and dumb, there are very dumb people even among PHDs too, but itās not that common like he say it is.
The majority of very well educated people, are actually overly-ducated, much beyond their actual level of intellect, and gain very little to nothing from it; that is indeed correct.
It is called being āeducated beyond your capacityā.
That is a blatant lie. My objection is when politics invades mathematics, since it takes over and becomes the primary objective rather than the mathematics itself. So I care a lot about mathematics, and want to protect it from politics, and for this you call me a math denier? Thatās called a bald-faced lie.
These are standard notations and if you were confused you could have asked. So now youāve admitted you donāt know standard notation and that you couldnāt understand it even if I explained it to you. Ok well that settles it. You have no clue what you are talking about.
Kid you couldnāt answer a very basic question on statistics. I do not think you have the intellectual clout to be calling other people stupid, let alone āTHE stupidestā. By the way, I know this is a common problem for you, but you misspelled āstupidiestā which is a little bit ironic since you are going around and calling other people stupid. You might want to fix that if you want your trolling to not be super obvious.
Dude, you make moer political statements than anyone!
Even I, a Far Righter, am less political than you.
Me: Politics should stay out of math.
Jonus: OMG HEāS A MATH DENIER
Jonus: ALL HE DOES IS GOOGLE STUFF TO SOUND SMART
Also Jonus: HEāS MORE POLITICAL THAN I AM!
This is called double-think kid. You canāt claim to be less political as you engage in purely political attacks that contribute literally nothing to the conversation.
Itās a well-known terran-syndrome when they hit a bunch of Zealots with ā¦4 EMP. Normal-sane people can understand the second EMP with the lone Zealot that escaped the first. But the third and the fourth have been shrouded in mystery.
I guess education beyond the multiplication table (a lot of morons with degrees use calculators even for calculating 18X100) is a waste of resources for most of those dorks.
The great De Andre sang: Intellettuali dāoggi, idioti di domaniā¦
Todayās intellectuals are the tomorrowās idiots (free translation).
Again your reading comprehension lacks. My qualm is with the fact that science DOESNāT revolve around computers and relevant disciplines (number theory, statistics, etc), which are extremely powerful tools. So when you start saying the opposite, itās time to realize you are so extremely biased it even affects your ability to comprehend simple text.
For example, the heat transfer equation can be derived from flipping coins (quite literally). Statistics is a fundamental foundation of applied math and science, PERIOD. So when you say the opposite, you really have to clue what you are talking about.
Protect math?
You are literaly advocating to abandon math and replacing with āsomething betterā. You do not care to āprotect mathā.
Also, I just started in this very day Statistics class, I have no problem saying I donāt know something, I donāt know wtf you meant with max(Xi, n), to me it looks like a mispelled version of max(Xi,i) for i natural going to infinity, and by X ~ U(9, 3) wtf is the ā~ā suposed to be.
I can throw here a bunch of definitions/notations that youāll have to resort to google to respond to.
Iām still an young math undergrad but I can still pick you up on your bull when you say things like this:
Lmao.
First, itās spelled āliterallyā, Mr. āEveryone else is the stupidest person Iāve ever metā.
Second, I advocated for improving upon the outdated areas of math, some of which are hundreds of years old, when there are clearly better ways to solve the same problems. YOU and your MIGHTY reading comprehension exaggerated this into āwow heās a math denierā.
The reason I created this thread is because there is a clear negative correlation between sc2 and intelligence. We see that in this thread. We have half a dozen trolls pouring into this thread to insult me, call me stupid, say I am a math denier; all while they make excuses for why they canāt answer basic questions on the topic of mathematics, contradict basic mathematics, show they struggle with reading comprehension and spelling.
Itās pretty darn clear SC2 is a game of speed, not intellect.
Again, thanks for the confirmation that you donāt understand some basic standard notation. Now imagine a kid saying heās got a minor degree in math who canāt read scientific notation (e.g. 6.8 x 10^9). Obviously such a kid would be lying about having a minor degree in math.
X means a random variable that has a certain distribution. X ~ U(min, max) means X has the distribution of a uniform distribution with a minimum value of min, maximum of max. Xi means the individual values of a sample where i ranges from 0 to n that were sampled from X ~ U(min, max). n is the sample size obviously.
So yeah, really basic stuff.
Kid there is literally no possible way you could tell a diamond from a turd, mathematically speaking, when you havenāt taken an introductory class to statistics. There is no possible way. We can definitively say your statement here is unequivocally false.
LOL, why this reminds me of Gateās (someone who did not even completed the basic education in whatever) plans to interfere with Math curriculum in USA.
Soon they will remove math beyond the multiplication table because āMathā is Eurocentric, non-inclusive and sign of white-privilege (the fact that more than half of algebra has nothing to do with EU escapes those morons) and the best math-minds today are Asian, Indian and Russian.
This clown (BatZ) is eager to bring-down the math edifice before building something better.
He says: we put the dynamite in the foundations today because tomorrow i/we(the woke generation) will build something better.
Goba+Mercurial+Jonus: first build your ābetter mathā and only THEN demolish the 3000 year old construct created by a multitude of civilizationsā¦
First, not everyone, just you and you only. Also, English is not my first language and we are in a videogame forum so I excuse miself for any mispell and I donāt give a damn if you care so much.
Second,
If is so trivial and there are āclearā ways why donāt you, magnanimous intelligent individual, throw humanity some light with your massive heavy wisdom?
Not a math denier btw, yeah I have might read this wrong also. That is another BS by the way. Calculus is teached in class in Riemman sum method, the thing is the āprimitiveā method of integration is just Riemman sum when dx aproaches 0, so you can find the primitive formula instead of putting it in numbers.
I think you are too upset and stumbling in your own words, itās not ānegativeā, itās ānoā correlation, it happens when you are upset and have no confidence in what you are saying.
When it stinks everywhere you might wanna look at your own shoes.
No one should be ashamed of not knowing something, education is a priviledge, the problem is when you come into my field that you know nada about it and call a bunch of bs and non unjustified criticisms. If you like to play I can give you something too:
Prove f:A->B is injective if and only if: https://prnt.sc/1aldtt7
Now, this is in my first list of exercises on Real Analysis, discipline that even comp sci students take. I tried to come up with something hard to google but you can never be so sure. You can prove it or not it doesnāt prove you are stupid or not, what does is everything you said above so this is only for fun.
If thatās his rambling on politics on math is about, itās laughable, such a small menorities of undergrads math sjws and tbh I think they might even be troling or sarcastic so it can reach dumb brains like Batz to call āall math is poisonedā, making them adopt ridiculous positions like he is in this thread.
Yeah, itās like Einstein physics is more accurate therefore we should abandon Newton and never teach Newton again in schools.