I am a high GM who can spam literally any random strategy or build order and beat players like PartinG. APM is 99% of SC2.
Again that’s not how it works. You can have game understanding that trumps even Serral but if you have the APM of a Bronze league player you will be Bronze. APM correlates with league but there is some scattering on a local scale, meaning other factors have a minor impact. So APM decides if you are a Bronze or a GM, while other factors decide if you are Bronze 1 or Bronze 3. You can see that very clearly in this chart:
Total crap. KingCobra has Serral game-knowledge and 150-200APM (Dia following your BS), he keeps oblireating Zergs with 300-400APM and one Zerg was…800APM.
He is 6300MMR in EU and Top 30 GM.
Sure, if a typical GM is 120-150APM. The point with Cobra is that his APM is 150 but his virtual APM is 350.
He manages (due to his IQ and skill) to do more with less. What normal morons achieve with 300-400APM he is able to achieve with 150APM.
my apm depends on opponent activity. this is like 60-80 apm vs cannon rushers, proxy barracks and ling flood. ~120 vs passive opponents. and up to 250 vs active harassers
More and more batz predictions verified. You doing alright there buddy? I don’t know what it feels like to be completely and utterly destroyed in debates so there is no way I could possibly console you. You called me a math denier for saying they need to abandon traditional modes of math in favor of programming. Oh boy were you wrong. Yikes. In fact it’s hard to imagine how you could possibly be so wrong and yet so confident. Dunning Kruger at work. Programming is math 2.0 and they still teach math 0.1 in schools. Talk about cave men in our education systems.
Oh boy, batz is back baby letsgo! Punch the troll is my sport.
First of all, programming is one thing, math is another, also every math PHD is already a programmer so you are decades behind. Already wrong by ignorance but let’s continue.
Second, you can very well teach a kid mathematics in the computer or in the chalkboard, that doesn’t change the fact you are still teaching math, the method does not change the content. The thing is that for you to do the “math 2.0” you need the today’s “math 0.1” in school, doesn’t matter how you teach it.
Third, modern math is so far away from what you and I know, it is soooooooo much more complex than you will ever be able to imagine with your rotten brain. Only because you know how to compute calculus does not mean you realy know math.
Modern Algebra for example is about Monster Groups, Moonshine Theory, Lie Algebra and so much more. This video can give you taste of the math that you reject because “it’s not about math anymore”:
