TvP is fine. PvZ, not so much.
1 Like
The issue is how to buff Zerg. Usually buffing something in one mu affects th other mu too much.
I think the emp buff balanced it a bit better
1 Like
I’m still waiting from you replays of how you beat KingCobra and Genius. In macro, cheese or 2 base all-in doesn’t count.
Until then it is safe to assume that either your TvZ or TvT is just very bad - e.g. you are trying to use builds that don’t work or something is terribly wrong with your understanding of these matches - or you are throwing TvZ/TvT on purpose to keep you MMR artificially low.
This is quite an absurd thing to demand of me when 1) I don’t even know who they are, and 2) they’re likely quite a large range of MMR higher than me.
Please stop hounding me - even if I had such replays - which I don’t due to the MMR range I mentioned, I wouldn’t because you are a colossal douche-bag who loathes hearing anything different from his own opinion and would demand to see something even more absurd even if I did have the replays you asked for.
In short, go screw yourself.
EU GML players around 6K MMR
Actually I would accept you beating RotterdaM as a proof of your claims, despite the fact that he is not as good as these too (he is not in GML in EU, at least wasn’t). Still a known US GML Protoss who is not a progamer.
You are claiming that TvP is fine despite posting NO logical arguments, NO videos of progamers or just good streamers playing and NO replays of your own.
And you have an audacity to call other people a “douche-bag”.
Your only arguments in a conversation seems to be an insults to other people. GJ!
Maru versus Stats - after the most recent patch. two of the best players on the planet, a TvP, which Maru won with a late-game against arguably the best lategame toss on the planet:
My own replays are on a thread in the Terran forums, but they’re not high level replays which is why I don’t cite them as evidence for balance.
I’m calling you a douche-bag because you are, in fact, a douche-bag because , you can’t take accept else’s opinion.
At around 2:56:00 Maru killed Warp Prism with 4 HT by pure luck. That was supposed to be Storm drop I believe.
At ~3:02:00 you can see Stats fighting with Vikings without Storms.
At ~3:05:30 again no Storms on top of Viking ball.
No WP harass. Stats having 8K minerals / 3K gas bank
47 probes killed by nukes.
Overall it looks like Maru was WAY faster then Stats thus Stats made a lot of mistakes.
~3:18:00 Stats pushes into WM minefield without any Observer
~3:20:00 Stats just walks into liberation zones. Why??!!
Overall the second game was won by a base trade (which is always a coin flip) that happened before Stats get a single Tempest.
So it was hardly a macro game.
You are calling me a douchebag because you are incapable of discussion
Thanks for pointing that out.
Especially the raven I feel got huge nerfs… despite the turrets now being stronger in an assault but you don’t want to use the raven offensively anyways since it’s so slow and easily sniped (and very expensive). I thought he was better as a backup caster back then. Totally not talking of mass raven players of course - ketrof or what hes called. So the thing is IMO (from watching) Sc2 is a constant battle of rebuilding and traading armies efficiently. A caster that you use only once doesn’t fit in there too much, since when it doesn’t die but you already build the back up you have too many…
The anti armor missile is only used once , you need one raven… or 1-3 for bigger armies. not too interesting vs Zerg. I disagree with removing its damage completely. (it was too big yes, but ZERO damage nullifies any use of at least a few more ravens (in case the first ones die) so if they don’t die you can add some little more aoe damage - LIKE 5.