Delete This Post Please
2 Likes
Im afraid its a l2p issue 
Zerg has its bs too
1 Like
You are exaggerating a bit here.
Sure, battlecruisers are ridiculously frustrating, but we have pretty much a nice way of dealing with them similar to double stargate phoenix: you hunker down, you mass queens with several spores (maybe a few roaches for some hellbats push)and try to outdrone the damage while building a spire somewhere. Its not pretty but it kinda works.
Thors destroying broods super hard, I agree that it is a bit too much. Honestly, thors might be a bit too good at this point.
Just hunker down and push economy, you will outgrow the terran and punish him with superior numbers.
1 Like
#onlyterranplayerswhine
2 Likes
99% of these problems would be fixed if we just tied tj and yamato to the same cooldown and reverted either the range buff or aa priority from the thor.
7 Likes
Jump+Yamato is a problem, but by looking at the image I donāt think you lost because of BC because that strat becomes imba only when the BC are massed at lategame, when you can destroy expansions,hit 10-12 yamatos and then fly away, BCs are not OP when you just have a small group of them because even 8-10 mutas are enough to defend against a low BC numbers.
3 Likes
Surprisingly, 100% of these problems would be fixed if the OP would l2p and not balance whine without having to change the game at all!
They increased the GtA range by 1 under the pretense of Fast Tempest (it was BS but OK), then they nerffed the fast Tempest (both speed and acceleration) but āforgotā to adjust the Thor Range accordingly.
So now we are with +1 Range Thor that wrecks Tempest/Carrier and all Zerg Air (that was ā¦collateral-damage).
I could write an essay with a lot of such disgusting ninja-buffs that just by chance (mind you) only benefitā¦terrans.
The anti P/Z bias of the MoronTeam is disgusting.
3 Likes
Really you canāt punish s greedy Terran ? With ling bane ? with mutas?
How does Terran has a better economy/macro then your zerg?
Whatās hilarious to me, is how the same people upvoting and supporting this thread, with some of the most obvious and pathetic Zerg whine, will then immediately go and cry about how Terran players all whine.
TVZ has not been in a better spot in years and it still slightly favors Zerg, but these kids will just whine and cry about how Terran OP Terran is.
Thors are strong, but when you are comitted to an attack, they are stuck after an engagement.
Neurals are still good against them.
Just because the OP can improve does not mean he didnāt lose because of imbalance, these are not mutually exclusiveā¦
Funny, TvZ was at an even better spot before the 3 zerg nerfs last patch, yet you justify those nerfs all the same.
1 Like
But this thread has no votes 
Zerg is both easier (stronger on the ladder, relative to pros) and stronger (at the pro level). Youāre right. Itās not mutually exclusive that he improve, but thereās no evidence TVZ is imbalanced. Just you, and him, crying about imba which doesnāt exist.
This funny specimen of terran is of the opinion that in one point of time the things are balanced, after nerrfing one race and buffing the other this funny terran is convinced that the game is ā¦still balanced.
Rational people should be asking overtime bonus just for reading this BS.
No surprise that BatZ run circles around this super-high IQ Terran (he is in the Top 0.01% of terrans with stellar IQ of 67).
1 Like
Or the 3/16 DH representation, 1/8 GSL season 1, 1/8 so far in GSL season 2ā¦
Tell me, how do you rationalize zerg winrates going up after receiving 3 nerfs?
Or do you think that the removal of purity and industry caused this shift, despite not even being used in the GSL?
If you want to actually admit that, while Terran might be OP at the absolute peak, but is still balanced even at the pro level (and slightly UP at the GM level), then maybe you have a point.
But, if youāre like 99.9% of other Zergs on here, youāre probably going to tell me that Terran is easy, the extra MMR Zerg gets is because itās harder, and only the stats you cherry pick (usually from GSL, because the format benefits Terran) really matter.
You canāt really have it both ways. Either Terran is incredibly difficult, but OP at the Zenith of player skill, or the pro stats from aligulac matter.
Deleted this postā¦
Ohh I forgot about BC harass buildsā¦ and I was trying my old mech ways
Oh yea dude, like you said, every zerg player is about 1 league higher than they should be.
You should say it more, maybe it will encourage more people to play zerg so that our playerbase is higher than 27%.
Take a look at the playerbase %, you will see zerg is the low, protoss is the medium, and terran is high. Try and see how you theory stacks up to the proportional increase of representation in lower leagues as playerbase % increases 
All your theory proves is that lower playerbase is indicative of a higher barrier of entry, which zerg has had since WoLā¦
Perhaps the most braindead theory Iāve seen the TCF endorse is the idea that zerg representation sub-diamond is indicative of how much easier the race is.
Low barrier of entry = popularity, which is why zerg popularity mirrored that of protoss for 2017-2019, until they got nerfed to the ground, causing them to fall 3-4% lower than 2016 levels. Also note during 2017-2019, terran was underpowered, which caused them to have a small dip in popularity, yet still remained by far the most popular. Since then, terran popularity has increased to slightly higher than 2016 levels.
Tbh I donāt even know why Iām bothering to argue with a guy that thought spikes in apm during production cycles was the reason zergs have higher apmā¦
Sorry but 50 actions in 1 second is equivalent apm to 50 actions over 5 secondsā¦ It just becomes blatantly obvious that this is the case when offracing zergs have higher apm than other races of that mmr, since they are used to having more to doā¦ 
