Blizz delete useless battlecruiser and give to terran a real T3 unit

General Discussion
1

Can you please blizzard delete this gimmick useless Battlecruiser and give to terran a real T3 unit please ? Thx
This unit can’t take a fight, it’s a T3 use only for harass. We don’t need another harass unit. We need a T3 unit to fight please.

4 Likes
2

The unit doesn’t need to be replaced, just teleport gimmick removed and some serious dps added.

5 Likes
3

ah ya, the unit that most pros have been using to win games with lately. ya it’s pretty bad… LOL

26 Likes
4
  • Tactical Jump removed
  • Fusion core requires Armoury first
  • Buffed DPS/Speed?

We can all agree TJ is stupid, and we can all agree you can get a battlecruiser way too quickly. Requiring an armoury before you can get a fusion core would really delay it. And if we could make it a bit stronger, it could be a viable T3 unit in the late game, and not for harass

4 Likes
5

Have they? It’s an okay opener in TVZ, and it’s really good late game TVT, but most pros use it? Or most pros throw it in occasionally?

3 Likes
6

theres just no response really needed when these come out to the field against toss in particular

just spam more stalkers…stalkers counter everything terran can make cept marauders

1 Like
7

I don’t agree with that.

1 Like
8

I dont agree with that

3 Likes
9

Whether it’s balanced is a completely different question, however I think Tactical Jump is possibly the worst ability in the game. It’s completely unfun to play against. You can have a battlecruiser teleport into your base early game, which is defendable, I don’t like it, but it’s fine.

It’s the mid-lategame use that annoys the hell out of me. They can abuse the Yamato+Tactical Jump to snipe a bunch of units and lose absolutely nothing, which is awful. They can also completely invalidate Abduct, the amount of times I’ve seen a BC abducted and then it just teleport away, you essentially need enough Corruptors to one shot a BC, which leaves you very sparse on the ground. It’s incredibly frustrating to both play against and watch.

1 Like
10

Hello, I am zerg player and I would like to offer you a trade. I will give you highly sought after zerg tier 3 “broodlord” in exchange for terran bc, sound fair?

9 Likes
11

You don’t have to tell me you’re a zerg player. I knew that was the case when I read “profile has been hidden”…just like batz, beserk, traction, etc.

1 Like
12

Thanks, I will not tell you I am a zerg player :crab::lobster::crab:

5 Likes
13

But you have zero games played…

Do you even know what a battlecruiser is??

Do you even know what is meant by T3?

4 Likes
14

If I could build 20+ vikings/corruptors at once and then morph them into Broodlords, I would accept.

I would just snipe your bases too then morph them into BL.

1 Like
15

Yes, they’d obviously be morphed from vikings, but only after the starport upgrades into “greater starport”.

2 Likes
16

Don’t think that’s possible.
Since the T at ~5min has all tech tree free.
Terra would rush build 100% again.

17

Deal, it is still cheaper and requires less micromanagement then having to build 4 starports with a reactor each.

18

You know I would just make a cyclone and shut your early game attack down, or just make 4 vikings. You would not be able to mass BCs and would come back crying for your BLs.

1 Like
19

I’m okay with the idea that it’s a poor design. Most of the threads dedicated to it are all from Ace, who just cries no matter what tools Terran has that are even remotely difficult to defend.

Only issue being, Terran already has the highest number of useless units, I don’t want to see one more that’s just completely useless.

2 Likes
20

You would also need to build at least 4 building before you could get a BC. Barracks, Factory, Starport, Fusion Core.

Edit: Let´s say, a pool, roach warren, spire, infestation pit.