Terran is the easiest race, that’s why they have lower MMR and thus are in lower leagues. Protoss is the hardest race, that’s why they make up nearly 50% of GM.
Very logical, right guys?
13 Likes
I was talking on forums on frost giant and it is already crowded by PPP. They say it is completely irrelevant, that one race has constantly highest GM representation 2 years by huge marging and hit record 45% which no race ever did in LOTV and previously not sure in HOTS, as it doesn’t show!
Also at start of LOTV Protoss had lowest gm representation, because Zerg was imba at that period and was 40% gm. Precisely from 11/2016 to 11/2017. Which correlates to period zerg was most OP! Protoss gm representation was worse then Terrans at that time! Protoss was good vs Terran, but PvZ was like 43% on aligulac and worst matchup in the game long time, so protosses had hard time getting gm, because every game was PvZ probably! Isn’t it funny how it correlates to Zerg OP period?
Also protoss started having huge win rates in TvP on aligulac, after they nerfed cyclone, also heavily correlates to that patch! Because cyclone builds were only thing to punish greedy third and protosses could take every game greedy third, without fear of punishment! So they had to play more safe, similar with mines. Protoss doesn’t even need detection before third… While terran has to make raven, or blind turrets to not autolose and then it is blink all in, which hits even harder then in hots on blink maps are you are dead.
Some bronze PPP will harass me on forums, while didn’t even started talking about balance, just that people should have right to talk about balance, without being harassed, is that too much to ask??? Also i read every balance patch almost and played this game since WoL! Some bronze leaguer, will say that sc2 is balanced and guess what, then it showed that he didn’t even play SC2, he wasn’t as bad as others, but still.
Not to mention, when first sb was introduced, 1 base protoss build with proxy sb to contain terran on 1 base was unbeateable literally it was 100% free win and then it took 1 month to nerf it, that major imbalance!
Or remeber, before they nerfed adepts, it was mass only adept every game, even polt was losing to some noobs! Also when open lotv beta came out Polt was practicing yet on HOTS tournaments and he played one day lotv beta and didn’t have mmr in that, he played legit diamonders! And after stream he looked at his match history and he lost 10 out of 14 days, adept 1 base drop was unbeatable literally how broken it was.
Also remember blink buff ? Tos could blink on 2 siege tanks and bunker and marines and still win LMAO… It was autoloss, because you had to overdefend every game and still you could autolose and if the didn’t do that = 100% autolos as you was os behind!
YOu can notice terrans always were meh, somewhere in middle and never even once in LOTV had highest GM representation, what are the odds right? Seems like Terran is pretty shi t! I was was once top 1 masters and could get beyond 5400 mmr when there were 360k players, both TvP and TvZ felt ridiculous, i had to outplay my opponent severely and then i still lost some of games, because you can outplay hard and still lose with Terran, it is so dumb!
I get outplayed all the time by GMs on ladder with my protoss offrace and then they still lose HAHAHAH!
So PPP were saying something like GM representation doesn’t matter, that there are only 200 slots and it isn’t large enough pool and that representation in masters in balance. When same hardcore people, which got into masters are probably playing the game and it is not that hard to get to masters. T1 Diamond and masters t3 is same basically! Also they ignored what i said at beginning of this post.
And said something that people choose race, what is fun to them and that it means nothing imbalance in gm, as only 200 slots… Also ignored replays, facts and statistic i posted… And only made excuses and warped everything as usual.
Even beating gms 5600, they said it means nothing. Or i said i beaten zerg with 222 EPM with 90 epm, they said it means nothing you can get to gm with 100 apm. Only excuses, i analyzed replay, completely ignore. I was just downvoted and flamed only, no one even read anything…
Hope PPP won’t infest frost giant’s game. These are stupidest people on the earth i swear and suffer from sever delusions, literal neurotic psychosis. Geez i don’t even, probably there is animal clever then them… hope frost giant will not ban people talking about balance on reddit as sc2 reddit does, even if it is constructive polite post, provided with facts… And will ban toxic people, which flame people for nothing!
Dude these 30 iq PPP don’t even know what is logic…
1 Like
http://aligulac.com/periods/
1 Like
Why you posting this again? It shows since 11 2017 protoss is highly favored against terran and pvz was worst all the time, recently protoss had couple good periods, after buff. But zerg is still favored on high level… You can count every period and protoss is leading like 27 to 9 on above 50 win rate periods. Yet if terran get above 50% it is not usually more than 51, while protoss gets even up to 55%
Also i checked often past years 6k players and they have in 90% cases 10-20% less TvP win rate then in any other matchups. I checked like 30 players around 6k etc…
My PvT is like 60% and my TvP like 45%… While i practiced Terran 10 years and i am now higher mmr with my protoss offrace with couple hundred games then with terran…
I was 50 rank terran masters first time, before mmr split and after offracing 30 games as protoss i ranked to 15 rank masters highest achieved at that time and beaten 140 gm zerg abusing pylon overcharge and ruptors ported back 6 times in one game!
And protoss alows me beat players 700 mmr above my skill easily, while with terran i can’t do that! While my builds aren’t even good, i just macro… With protoss i have easier time vs gms, then with terran against 5100-5300 terran, or 4700 tos… AS 5300 terran is like 500 mmr under his skill probably…
PPP: A harder race results in moving UP the ladder, understand?!?!!? WIPES DROOL OFF FACE
3 Likes
Ironic that you bring this up while making fun of PPP logic. Terrans being the most played race in lower leagues doesn’t somehow make it difficult lol.
1 Like
All bots getting off on each other aside, Terran is the most difficult race. I’m not sure if you guys classify me in the PPP (though you guys put anyone who disagrees with you in that category anyway, so desperate to make that acronym stick LOL), but I will say Terran is definitely the hardest race.
Now don’t get me wrong, each race has its own set of challenges and difficulties and ways to maximize the true potential of the race. From my experience of playing all three races though, Terran has it the most difficult. By how much, it’s hard to say. But I will definitely say Terran is the hardest race consistently.
If you are D2 or lower, you can pretty much do whatever you want as long as you have good macro for any race. So for the majority of the TCF, your complaints are not valid. All races are easy to play 100 apm or lower.
1 Like
???
bottom text
Terran has the highest potential, but you need literally 300 to 450 APM to play Terran perfectly, like Bomber used to get, or G5’s Broodwar Protoss APM or something like that.
1 Like
Actually, people mostly focused on APM. I wonder if there is a average different hot key strike to control an army.
By the way, OP is such a straw man, oh well.
1 Like
I agree with you. PPP have poor logical skills. They just want an easy “win” button. Well, they practically have that easy “win” button when they pick Protoss.
3 Likes
Sure thing Mr.barcode, sure thing. You are not a hypocrite indeed.
I don’t know what a strawman is thanks to you? Hmm…, who do I thank if I know what a strawman is then?
LMAO just read forums and logic of these PPP… They say exactly that…
I don’t know, how does that compared to what you guys said? Are they copying your strat?
You can hit M1 with under 200 APM. I am proof of that, and APM is not a great indicator of skill. Anyone below 5k mmr with really high APM is doing more harm by slamming their keyboards inefficiently. I’ve never seen a non-gm with high APM use it efficiently - especially when their EPM is ~100 or lower even.
1 Like
Protoss is 41.76% on EU, 40.43% on NA, and 38.10% on KR.
TCF conclusion: Protoss is “nearly” 50% of GM
(Psssst… Terran is 37.04% of GM in KR and has been rapidly rising since September while Toss has been falling)
1 Like
In Broodwar APM has a 70% correlation to win percentage, and therefore League Raniking too, which means high APM matters more often than not.
I’m not sure what the Correlation is ot win percentage or league ranking in SC2.
Another thread with another HATRED against one single playable race.
These types of thread are useless, they only show hatred, are only based on emotion and not on actually identifying any problems.
These threads are spammed every day by trolls or just salty people.
The most common posters are people who refuse to share their profile info and hide it, who are named theBatz or something else.
They claim that one race is Overpowered without showing data, claiming that it’s causing the death of the game, while nothing signifies the death of this game more than the fact that these people are so undoubtly toxic and do not get instabanned for the amount of spam they cause on the forum.
How it seems after every game they loose the first thing they do is post on the forums instead of analysing the replay.
You are the most toxic group of people and I am glad that the future of RTS is in good hands on the forums of this other company.
1 Like
Neeb himself has 10 to 20 or so of the barcode accounts at the top of GM.