The return of open queue ruined role queue

[Megadodo-11847]

@MrNegotiator-2325

@anon31701258

How about you stop blabbing about all those pieces of evidence you keep bringing up in each RQ/OQ threat and actually just provide us with all the exact pieces you’re referring to.

Here are the pieces I’m personally aware of and which have existed for a couple of months now:

1. In an official Developer Update a few months ago Jeff Kaplan himself said that 2/2/2 role - queue was overall a “positive” change.
2. Here are some official developer quotes that were released a couple of months ago:

@ScottMercer

it’s been great to see so much positive feedback about match quality in a role queue world.

And even more importantly, here’s the point where the overall very positive opinion of the majority of the game’s player base is touched upon:

@ScottMercer

With the generally positive feedback we also seen some a few concerns from players.

@ScottMercer

We also believe that games of Overwatch are better when both teams have balanced team compositions. This has been the loudest, most noticeable positive feedback from everyone.

3. I have to admit this isn’t such a trustworthy source, but just the fact that the grand majority of the unofficial polls created in social places as historically negative for some reason as these Forums have surprisingly shown 2/2/2 role - lock to be a clear winner amongst fans, with the different concensus sometimes even touching 3:1 in favor of the system is a substantial feat…

You are of course free to make up your own mind about any of them.

None of these are valid sources of data to support the claim of a majority of players preferring 222