I get that they are both more focused on dps now, but they all go about it in a different way. Doom doesnât play like soldier doesnât play like Diva doesnât play like Bastion doesnât play like Rein doesnât play like Widow doesnât play like Zarya. They all have their own way of playing. They donât feel homogenized to meâŚIMHO.
Sym was viable for the 99% of the playerbase and that is what was important.
Literally the biggest reason why she was reworked was because of 0 OWL playtime. And look where that got her: an OWL gimmick with no strength in ladder.
Most people talk about 2.0 when they mean her golden era. No one in their right mind prefers 1.0, since all she was able to do is being a shield hp and TP bot.
If I had to guess, which ever one I like the least, as that seems to be their track record for everything. So zen, because having more than just a single pacifist healer is apparently too much to ask for.
You say that like tanks donât various strengths to perform certain jobs that still fit either of those roles? But yes Iâm sure removing orisas unique shield mechanics for accretion 2.0 and making another damage focused tank that doesnât do tank things isnt homogenization. /s
Hard disagree. As a dva main, the âuniquenessâ and ânichenessâ of heroes has for too long been an easy excuse for keeping heroes uniquely BAD and their niche being LOSING.
The heroes are not losing fundamental character, they are being rounded out so they can actually survive and thrive in a 5v5 environment.
Yup, when it comes to the Tank role. âEach Tank hero can be balanced to be near equally viable, instead of keeping some Tanks as trash picks outside of certain Tank synergy strategiesâ is pretty huge for worthwhile+unique choices.
That said, D.va could use a bit of a buff in 5v5, but thatâs the thing, thereâs nothing structural stopping her from getting a buff(s), other than the devs havenât gotten around to it yet.