Okay so yesterday I made a post about this discussing into the whole soldier 76 being gay thing which I will put the link to here: S76 gay...? But... Ytho...?
In that post I wrote a lot that was pretty much the same thing a lot of other people were saying so it didn’t really get the whole point across. Plus since half the people only read the title and not the whole post that didn’t really go over that well.
But anyway, in this post I’m not gonna be talking about the fact that soldier IS gay or bisexual or whatever.
I’m gonna be talking about why a lot of people seem to dislike the idea of it and how it could of been presented in a way where people would be more okay with it. Now let me explain.
I feel as if the reason why a lot of people are off on the whole big suprise or at least one of the reasons I was was because of how it was presented. It was just kinda shoved into the short story. Little explanation before hand. No development or build up or a story behind it. Just poof here it is. Which is a big problem. Especially if this isn’t just a PR stunt and overwatch is actually trying to get people use to the idea of gay characters on video games and other media.
Now Overwatch has a huge story. One that we only know the bare minimum of a fraction about. And that’s alright I guess (despite most people including me wanting to hear more about the overall story more then just once a year when archives rolls around or a new hero is released out of the blue) and something the overwatch devs like to do is suddenly shove a random chunk of lore from a random point in the timeline in our faces and say it’s official. Which is also alright I guess. But that’s to a point. The point being when it’s something along these lines.
Back to the topic, I don’t have any issue with a characters sexuality. I have an issue with the presentation.
If something is wrote in a story then it’s supposed to have meaning in said story.
I don’t care if reinhardt is gay. Hell I don’t need to know that unless it adds something to the story in some way shape or form.
People argue a lot “oh well why’s widowmaker streight?” Or “why’s ana?” It doesn’t matter what they are. Their relationships add to the story. Gerald was a big part of black watch as seen in retrebution as well as this he helps give more major lore to widowmaker origin story being he was her husband and since talon didn’t really appreciate Geralds existence they had widow kill him but widow somewhere deep down still has feelings for her lost lover
Ana has a vandetta of some sort against her husband as seen in the in game voice lines. It is unknown why or why she refuses to tell pharah father she’s still alive. Thus adding to her character. Or at least having potential to do so.
However Jacks ex boyfriend just doesn’t do any of this. He only appears in a quick snid bit and isn’t mentioned again.
Sure you could say it adds to his character by showing how he puts his duty before his personal life but we already know that. It’s practically told to us in his official backstory on the Overwatch page and comics since day 1.
Aside from that it tells us nothing about the twos relationship or past. Thus adding nothing to the story and making it feel like it was just shoved in there to give Overwatch a token gay guy which just seems wrong on its own to me.
I would of been way more okay with it if it went more I to detail about the twos history. If it added more to soldier then just what we already knew. If they explored it more. Gave it build up.
Like tracer for example. In the comic where shes shown to have a girlfriend, it doesn’t say it right away. It gives us a bit of story first with tracer despretly trying to find a gift for someone special she cares about.
We get to see her reactions throughout the comics to various things that happen. How sad she is when she couldn’t get the scarf, how happy she was when she did, then it cuts to her going home where we see her other which most people assumed at first to be a room mate or something of the sort. But then through the diologue between the two and the Interactions/body language you can see how deeper they care for one another. Tracer even mentions in either the comic or in game voice lines (can’t remember which haven’t seen or played the game in a while) that her girlfriend is one of the reasons she fights.
Can you see the difference in presentation? Ones in depth and tells a story. The other just suddenly appears with little warning and then is gone with no more exploration. It feels like it was there just for the sake of being there.
If they gave us more backstory and/or made it add more to soldiers overall story or character conflict then things we already knew, I’m sure way more people wouldn’t have any issue with it.
Hopefully they can repair that by adding in more info between the two’s history later. But for now it just feels out of place.
I know I kinda went in circles with this post but I hope people now get the reasoning why a lot of people or at least me is/are upset about this whole thing.