The situation described in the statement I replied to had no mention that intent to play poorly had been established; and ergo, my statement stands
There is no âfalse reportingâ reporting category, nor any way to be certain that player x did false report you
Abusive chat is what I use. Because they literally told me they were going to false report me, usually with some other toxicity thrown in there. Rofl.
Not really.
Your whole thing is that âintentâ isnât established.
Either the player in question intentionally died 20 times or had an unbelievably bad game. There is nothing posited in the scenario that confirms either point.
If it was intentional the report wasnât false. You canât prove this isnât the case. The claim of âfalse reportâ is just as valid as the claim of âthe player was throwing.â
thats, uhm, well, pretty questionable from my point of view unless there is actual toxicity in the âim gonna report youâ statementâŚbut I understand the desire for a âretaliatory strikeâ in such a case
the whole reporting system is rife with problems, the biggest of which is the enforcement piece
In the statement I replied to, there was no mention of establishing intent
without intent established, a report of this behavior would be a false report
as such, my statement stands
dang the rock beat digital paper again!
hereâs 2
iDOTytimgDOTcom/vi/DIRrVvGKtXE/maxresdefaultDOTjpg
c1DOTstaticflickrDOTcom/5/4125/5018499879_04dbdea448_bDOTjpg
Or that one DPS hero
It is entirely possible that the player was intentionally feeding, which would make the report legitimate. You canât know because it isnât provided in the situation.
Therefore you canât claim with certainty that the report is false.
I would like to elaborate that 100% certainty of intent to sabotage is not a reasonable requisite to justify a report. Intent cannot be proven 100%. Whether or not a teleporter was placed too close to an edge or was âmissedâ could not be proven 100%. Whether or not a mei wall that got a teammate killed was intentional or not cannot be proven 100%. If 100% proof of intent is required then this entire reporting category is redundant.
Possible isnt the same as established
My statement stands
I wonât be replying to this side discussion any further
Jeff said the exact opposite of this.
Not willing to switch is not reportable. Unless the person is begin abusive in chat for you asking them to switch. But, no itâs not reportable itâs literally reason why one trick cannot be reported.
This DOT is pure evil
True - I am curious though on this after 2-2-2 goes in.
my name is GIR after all DOOM DOOM DOOM DOOM DOOM!
Really they should just make all the âsoftâ throws officially reportable.
They already are âde-factoâ reportable anyways since there is no consequence for doing so and the bans are enforced, so there is precedent for it.
Would resolve the disconnect between the letter of the law and the will of what appears to be a dominant portion of the community. Just go with the tyranny of the majority ,as the case may be.
How are the bans enforced.
As in, certain one-tricks get report bombed and blizzard bans them.
I donât understand the support team. The devs have said one trick isnât bannable. But, support team is enforcing the ban. As their the one you have to contact.
Thereâs literally a sentence that says ârefusing to switch is not reportableâ in the report section.
I get it, itâs annoying. Itâs still flase reporting.
Being bad at the game is not against the rules.