several problems with this post
First, the actual quote shown in blue is what was actually said. The title of this thread does not mean the same thing as the statement quoted in blue. Also, the actual statement quoted in blue does not translate whatsoever into “they have said no”
Second, plans can (and often do) change. We’ve seen this quite a bit in Overwatch.
Third, I know of no aspect of this subject that can be reasonably referred to as “insanity”. I am not sure why this attacking word was used.
Fourth, no one is making any nonstop requests in regard to this skin. The request is being made, but there is nothing “non stop” about it
Fifth, one can indeed choose to “move on” as the OP states he did from Illidan Genji, but this is a choice. One can choose to speak up on a matter, or one can choose to go silent on a matter. Either choice is equally fine. The fact that forum member A chose silence does not mean forum member B has to do so as well, despite what is implied in the opening post.
Sixth, there’s almost no chance at all that Blizzard would take even a penny of the proceeds from the possible re-offer of Pink Mercy. It would be a PR disaster, and Blizzard has far more than they can handle in that regard right now
Seventh, why is it being claimed in the same statement both that “its not coming back” and “Blizzard would take the money”. If its not coming back, there is no money for Blizzard to take. If Blizzard takes the money, it did come back. These statements are mutually exclusive, and yet, both statements are being made.