They had to think of the matchmaking and queue times when making the system.
The way I see it, this feature is for times when you queue up with the same person more than once a session, and they prove theyâre useless (or just having a bad day) so you donât get paired with them for the rest of that session. The chances of seeing the same person during different sessions has been abysmal from my experience, thus the auto removal.
This is the best day of Overwatch.
I donât care if it makes my queue time longer.
If I avoid someone itâs because theyâre toxic/throwing/smurfing and I donât want to play with them EVER AGAIN.
And what about when you run into smurfs on the enemy team? GMs on their Platinum smurfs single-handedly wrecking entire teams. Why can we not avoid them?
2 is not enough on low elo.
too many smurfs, toxic people
Yep, 2 is just a drop in the toxic ocean that is Competitive on console.
The impact Avoid as Teammate will have on consoles will be extremely minimal, if itâll even be noticeable at all.
This.
Whilst Iâm sure people want 200 (or more) avoid slots, theyâre the same people who are then on the forums moaning about long queue times.
The âavoidâ system has literally been out for what, like 3 hours? How about we try it for a day or two before asking for more avoids.
Oceania have at least 2 throwers/trolls every match.
I think we need more slots lol.
I find it absolutely hilarious that Jeff (not Geoff) specifically used the example of using this feature to avoid one-trick-haters in his video, and the one-trick-haters are all going jubilee on this as if it was a justification for their one-trick-hate-ism.
That said, I think this might work.
Then after the 7 days, you can put them back on the list. Jeff stated that clearly. So, you can avoid them forever, but it takes you putting them back on. If avoiding them permanently is so vital to you, just do the couple of mouse clicks. Christ.
That would involve learning and adapting. I donât see much of that in this community.
Honestly only two slots is extremely arbitrary. I get why they did it, but you can guarantee theyâll not help with reducing toxicity, due to the limited number.
A better system would be unlimited slots but having to explain why you blocked someone. Maybe have a filter for key words to distinguish between abusers and genuine users. But thatâs probably too much effort for Blizz
The statement was very ironic. Letâs state the obvious and truthful reason, this 2 limit avoid is specifically for the one tricks the GM community has been complaining about.
âOne trick hatersâ arenât going to be the ones adversely effected by longer queue times or the player population not wanting to play with them. This is their way of getting one tricks to try to change their behavior or form a six stack to play around them.
The entire language of the video was geared towards one tricks.
I will always be amazed by the fact-twisting skills employed by the anti-one-trick crowd. You guys are amazing, and should consider a career in politics.
https://us.forums.blizzard.com/en/overwatch/t/updated-player-experience-tools-for-1-22/42828
This is totally about that great Genji player and really not about the Torb or Sym one tricks who will be placed on the avoid list by nearly all of their teammates. Whatever you need to tell yourself to sleep at night I guess.
I think it goes without saying that Blizz understand a large number of one-tricks are going to be on peopleâs âavoidâ lists, the post you quoted doesnât even try to avoid that fact. Jeff even alludes to it towards the end of the recent developer update video talking about this new feature.
Yes, thatâs why just like the developer video itâs ironic that someone would claim the âanti-one-trick crowdâ are the one twisting facts.
At that point itâs not even about telling a lie to other people, its just lying to yourself if someone canât see this was primarily for and will primarily effect one tricks. I would think youâd have to be purposefully obtuse or naive to not see that. Either that or feel personally hurt by the upcoming storm that they know will happen to them.
This, right here, is the wisdom everyone need.
If you play off-meta (or âone trickâ), the people that will put you in the avoid list above, you know, ACTUAL throwers and griefers, are making you a favor by being one less toxic person you meet in your future matches.
The slots are extremely limited, I doubt too many people will keep a petty squabble going too long when they meet the people for who this system was designed to fight, and might start weighting the âissuesâ of playing next with a âone trickâ or a âtoxic mic screamer that throw a tantrum at the first lost team fight and start chain suicidingâ.
On top of that, grouping up nulls all effects of this avoid feature. If you end up with really long queue times, it might be faster to join a discord channel and grab a 6-stack really quickly.
i heavily disagree with your previous post and i donât think the point you mentioned there will apply, however, itâll definitely aislate anyone who one tricks a one meta hero/bad teamwork ppl solely because in comp the goal is simply ânot having funâ its to win
there, hope it sounds less rude and reasonable :0
The report system is there for those players and Iâve encountered less people outright purposefully throwing a match than people who refused to ever switch and were in effect doing the same thing.
This is true and itâs what people have said for a long time, if you donât ever want to play around your team maybe you should form your own team. I think the system will encourage different behaviors in certain people as evidenced by how attitudes are immediately changing for some.
Itâs not perfect but itâs a start, before today people would be saying that people who donât like playing with one tricks are the ones who need to form a six stack, immediately after the announcement people are acknowledging one tricks may have to form their own groups or be face long queue times.
Edit: I appreciate your edit Also looking out for you as people have tried to get me banned for similar postings.
Be nice. I heavily disagree with a lot of xavvyâs posts and find a few nonsensical but plenty of people do agree with them. They have a right to their feelings and viewpoint.