I agree. I’ve also always been in favor of either a mag size reduction or a longer reload time for her, which I think would be more fair than lowering her charge time. Increasing the charge time would be devastating for her and force people to relearn their timing. Lowering her mag size or decreasing reload speed would make every shot count more, making pinpoint precision more necessary. This would basically punish missing with her, because right now there isn’t much of a drawback. And it would lower her overall DPS without making her less effective at killing things. It would also give dive tanks and dive heroes more windows (or a longer window) to focus her down.
She needs teamwork to be effective as your team needs to keep the enemies distracted while work, otherwise you’ll get hard focused and kill anything will be much harder, especially if they have barriers or other hardcounters.
I’m sorry, but if Hanzo just about took all of your chicken nuggets, that would mean that he took almost every chicken nugget except maybe 1 or 2.
If you have 10 chicken nuggets, and he just about took all of them, then it’s reasonable to make the assumption that he took between 7-9 of them. That’s what “just about” means…
https://imgur.com/LybLaub
just about - almost exactly; nearly
So when someone says, “just about every meta”. that means nearly all of them. As in, if there are 6 metas, then “just about every meta” suggests 4-5 of the metas, Widow was present.
Clearly not the case here.
I don’t care about your explanations. You said something that was factually wrong. Just because there are reasons to why Widow wasn’t there, doesn’t change the fact that Widow WAS NOT there.
By the definition of the words “dependent clause”, a phrase which “depends” on the phrase following after it. It does not express a complete thought so it is not a sentence and can’t stand alone.
So when you have a quantity descriptor like the word “every” in the independent clause, that acts as a modifier to the phrase “just about”, going from figure of speech to implied quantifiable metric.
Which is the point I’m trying to make. Either you are trolling or deliberately misinterpreting my statement. Once triple tank and dive went away, snipers dominated, which resulted in a return to tanks and ultimately through other factors, GOATS
That just proves my point that you were backpedaling? As in, retracting your former statement so you could cover all of your bases so you’d be correct, to reinforce your angle?
The one thing that actually I feel balanced widow is her smg is actually pretty bad of you try to rely on that for steady output. I’m more irritated by Hanzo. He can one shot far off and close up. Has a really good ability that allows you to put out large amounts of damage and headshot with it as well. Plus his mobility and hit box are a huge benefit.
“Every” does not modify the dependent clause “just about”, “just about” modifies “every”. You literally agreed with that
All I said was that the statement “Just about every meta” implies most metas in response to you saying the word “every” overruled the modification of “just about”
The phrase I said was that snipers were a factor in the almost every meta. FACTOR. FACTOR is not the same as “present in”, something I NEVER said. In fact, I elaborated that their absence was a testament to that by virtue of tanks being overvalued.