MHz Analysis of New Role Queue (stinky or no?)

Yes, I get matches when I see that my team doesn’t even need me to win. And I find it not ok and not fun.

So you are admitting that it is possible to blame your team for wins. Not a question mark at the end of that sentence btw just in case you didn’t notice.

I am blaming matchmaking for creating a game where I am not even needed.
If you think these games are fun and fair - good for you.

So the thing I specifically reposted 2 times (aka a total of 3 times) is:

““winning can be negative, let’s take for example the person arguing about 20-40-40% chances, they are arguing that they can sit in spawn and win and this is a failure of matchmaking” Just highlighting this part because you obviously skipped over it.”

And in that same post " I personally believe winning a bunch of games because your team can 5v6 is a bad thing"

But are saying that I (ME) think those games are fair and dandy, and you are the one thinking that a win like that is negative (the whole point I brought up since you claimed you can’t blame for a win because a win is positive). You are trying to litterally say what I said and claim I am saying the opposite. Hm, wonder why you would try to impose your original claim on me and take my original claim for yourself, hmmm, maybe becuase my claim was correct?

Dude, stop playing games, you legit took what I said and turned it into the exact opposite while taking what I said and saying it for yourself. Wha… how… why are you doing this.

The point is that you tried to prove that I blame the team. And I am telling you that there is NO TOPIC on this forum where you can find me blaming the team.

I don’t care what you think. You accused me of so many bad things and were rude, that I don’t read your statements anymore. They’re not worht it until you apoligize.

?? Stop trying to word it differently Ben S. I didn’t say you were on forums and said word for word “I blame my team for this win” but I was saying that that is what you do when you win games because you yourself keep bringing up the scenario where you could do “nothing” and your team would still win, aka you had no impact on the game and your team is the one winning for you. I don’t get how I can break that down any further. You put resposibility on your team for getting steamrolled and that you couldn’t have any impact on making them win, and you put responsibility on your team for winning and that you didn’t have any impact on making them win. This is simple logic and you understand it but you just ignore it every time I say it because it would prove you wrong on something that doesn’t even really matter. We all have games where you can try your best and not win/try your worst and still lose, but your flaw comes when you say that there are only 20% of games from which you can do something to affect the outcome. Aka, if you send in 10 consecutive vod reviews to someone, they would only be able to give you advice and point out mistakes that would have won the game for only 2/10 of those games.

That’s all I have to say.

So you won’t apologize for repeatedly ignoring half of what I am saying even after pointing it out 3 times but are trying to make me feel bad because I honestly apologized once for saying “you” when assumed you realized who I was talking about because we both read and reacted to the same post. So you say its not worth it until I did, so I did, and you still refuse to answer to the other claims I point out and even the one which I made a 1 word error with. You are so backed into a corner at this point and trying to find any reason to leave when it is so obvious that you are wrong. I admit making a 1 word mistake but you can’t admit literally taking my claim and saying that i said THE EXACT OPPOSITE OF IT and then continuing to take that claim that I said, and use it in your own comment as your own claim. If in your next comment you choose to ignore that you literally took what I said and restated it as your own claim while claiming I believe the opposite [of what I said] I don’t know what to think of you. I apologize for assuming you agree with MHz because you are repeatedly defending him on his claims (not a far off mistake) and will you apologize for this:

What I say

I personally believe winning a bunch of games because your team can 5v6 is a bad thing

What you say in response

I am blaming matchmaking for creating a game where I am not even needed.
If you think these games are fun and fair - good for you.