I’m not entirely sure what you’re trying to say with this. If it’s that he didn’t specifically said “exciting changes”, then I’m sorry, I remembered wrong.
However, while he may not have used “exciting changes”, he’s still announcing a revert as an awesome change they’re experimenting with. That’s neither an awesome change nor anything they’re experimenting with, it’s literally half of what Mercy had prior to the nerf. There’s nothing there to experiment with.
Jesus christ, what’s with people in these forums putting up their shields at literally anyone? I’m siding with you saying that it’s a buff and you still call me out as if I was purposefully lying.
I dont get it. I was on your guys side until “fun” became the base for the argument. Mercy is fine, more niche and her typical DPS pockets arent top of the meta atm but shes fine.
Honestly want Jeff to release a 15 second Dev update saying, “Mercy is cancelled since ya’ll dont know how to act” at this point…
The amount of hp/s is something we could discuss on another topic. I’m specifically saying that announcing a half revert as “awesome changes we’re experimenting with” was bound to be met with anger and disappointment. It made me think they were adding some new cool effect to the ult, and I bet many people thought the same.
Imagine if they now announce awesome changes they’re experimenting with Pharah’s main weapon. People could start thinking that the bullets would have a new behavior. Maybe shield piercing? Maybe armor breaking? So many posibilities, so exciting!
And then it ends up being a half revert to the splash damage, where it gets a slight buff to splash damage and a slight nerf to direct hit damage, being somewhere in the middle of the last two versions we had. That’s bound to disappoint people.
Yeah, that’s probably it. The only thing I remember about that is that it ended up being so long I started skipping parts of it. It was soooo long…
Meant it ironically. I’ve read, watched that video dispite my dislike of her content now and thought about it. It’s a buff. If you want to look at it like a partial revert that’s on you but PTR Mercy is stronger than current Mercy.
Was she buffed from her pre-50 hps nerfs?
Nope ofc.
Was she buffed from her post-50 hps nerfs?
Yes. She now has more fps during her ult and a faster ult charge to compensate the loss of ult charge from rpevious fps nerfs.
This Post is a complete joke. If they make her stronger and change nothing else it’s a buff.
And stop coming up with the dump “she is still weaker than before” argument. Yes that’s why they nerfed her in the first place, becouse she was to strong. Is mccrees last buff not a buff becouse he was stronger in beta overwatch? No it’s still a buff obviously.
I mean… It is a statistical improvement (though absolutely not the one almost anyone wanted), so isn’t it a buff? Not trying to be sassy or anything, honest, I just don’t really get it.