For lower/mid ranks she was.
yes and thats because ana has a skill floor higher than mercys, doesnt mean ana wasnt more powerful when you were good with ana just because low ranks were garbo with her
I donât donât get what you are trying to say to me?
I agree Ana was more powerful due to the higher skill ceiling therefor was used more in the higher ranks, while Mercy a low skill ceiling hero is used more in lower ranks.
Which is how it should be.
So what?
Unless Iâm missing something o_o
Thats just wrong⊠beyblade, tank and even later during dive Ana was a much more prefered pick than Mercy. Saying high ranks dont count is just⊠I dont know if I should write that so I dont. The higher ranks and pro-play make up the meta which literally shows the rest of the playerbase âhow it should be playedâ. At least if you want to get better and win more.
Because this is about Mercy, an entry level hero who âskilledâ players should naturally stop using more than Ana the higher you go.
Not that Mercy should be trash, just not a preferred pick.
Thatâs a good contradiction we have here.
If you take it out of context of rank, then sure.
Taking specific words out of a post without context is kinda dishonest.
I donât understandâŠ
I though higher ranks didnât count.
That makes no sense at this point.
What?
âAna was never better than Mercy (only in high ranks which donât really count)â
âBecause the higher ranks had the skill to âcounterâ the Mercy by âclick her head lawwwl 4headâ
Its not that she wasnât a good healer, its that Ana (as she rightfully should) was the better option.â
Its two different situations (rank)âŠ
I donât get what you are trying to say eitherâŠ
Ok, so first you say
But then you say
Again you are abusing statistics. Low goldies donât learn, do they? Maybe thatâs why you think the game should be balanced around gold,silver,bronze.
People are talking that they want mercy WITHOUT GRANTING MERCY invulnerability on res. The statistics you have picked up are AFTER this patch that gave invulnerability to Mercy and after the Ana butchering (the only other main heal at the time).
Could you be so kind to reply to me. Because Iâm sick of calling out your bullsh*t and you staying silent until you find another Mercy thread to bump your not-matching-the-time-frame statistics. And all that because you have been proven wrong.
These are the appropriate statistics for the time frame we are talking about:
(nicolas has posted them)
That was in regards to the second paragraph, not the first sentence.
She talks about how Ana was superior in high ranks, which is irrelevant (maybe the word wrong was the (irony) wrong word to useâŠ)
So whereâs the problem ?
Ana was better than Mercy in the highest ranks, while Mercy was better in low ranks, as should be an âeasy to playâ hero.
The higher ranks are irrelevant? We should just remove Tracer then, since she isnât used in lower ranks, only in higher ranks and therefore irrelevant right?
Looks like the dive meta after Winston Shield buff (his pickrate in GM).
So how about the Mercy 1.5 with immortality and with Ana not being potato? xd
You said it was a contradiction, which was dishonest as you took it out of context.
I was only replying to say it wasnât.
Difference - Zarya still has that ability. It is just 2m shorter with a slightly faster ult charge due to her charge wind down being buff, and it is just as buggy with who it does and doesnât pull in and when.
Widowmaker being better than Torbjörn on higher ranks doesnât count. Torb is op in Bronze, thatâs the only place where balance countsâwhen nobody can aim.
Itâs almost like godtier Ana isnât in the game anymore.
I can agree with that but like I said Ana was better than Mercy.
@Topic: Mass-rez never was OP and I think pre-rework Mercy would have been easier to balance than the current mess we have.