And that is a prime example of a double standard folks
What?
Don’t call people out on a double standard when it isnt one
Dunno about you but saying that a hero should be UP bc you find then cheesy sounds very unfair to me
As finding a hero cheesy is subjective
1 Like
Then why introduce a hero like that in the first place? He has a place in the game, and he should be up there along the likes of other heroes rather than being complete crap right now.
2 Likes
Idk? Would you rather have 12 heroes that were balanced
Or
28 heroes
and only about 12 are at the top
All 28 heroes will never be balanced
unfair =/= double standard
cheese= unfun to play against
dying=unfun too so I think that argument is kind of bad.
1 Like
Qualifying a hero as unfun is already subjective
1 Like
28, because that would give them all the potential to be good.
1 Like
Lol i was defining what i was reffering to as “cheese”
Oh, it was much longer on console.
you said cheese is unfun, I define dying as unfun too that doesn’t mean we should nerf the TTK.
Yeah, ignoring a bastion to engage someone else usually ends up in a death prefaced by a THPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPTTH noise.
1 Like
Qualifying a hero as underpowered is already subjective
being picked less than 1% of the time is objective though, I win. His winrate is also negative in GM and Bronze.
You could literally poll the ow population if they have a fun time playing against bastion. I encourage you to do that
UP is based on facts
His low pickrate and winrate say this
That is actually a logical fallacy know as the composition/division fallacy
Who has fun playing against anyone?
I find tracer cheesy but that doesnt mean that she must stay underpowered or be nerfed?