a place for women and other marginalized genders to compete and grow their skills in a safe environment.
“safe environment”? do you understand that this strongly communicates that it usually would not be in other well-known and widely publicized circles? Wouldn’t League and Contenders be?
Okay, Blizzard (or e-sports committee): I understand you started the plan to re-establish credibility on strong misogyny, but it’s happening in the most wrong way. Is it a War of Genders? If hatred should not be fought with other hatred, “machismo” should not be fought with “feminism”, because they nullify the ultimate goal that both (or mixed ones) are all on the same level. A “female” tournament MAYBE might be more relevant on International Women’s Day to commemorate their efforts in history, but certainly not a “specially” organized tournament to say “make yourself feel like women! There are no men or other privileged categories”.
This article summarizes well the problem of how women are excluded from the world of e-sports. : https://www.theguardian.com/games/2021/dec/02/why-do-female-pro-gamers-earn-less-than-men-esports
Really, if there is a developer or community moderators (Jodie? Andy?) reading this topic, kindly pass it on to someone who deals with “corporate inclusiveness.”
- difference in salaries and e-sports bonuses
- Little accessibility to Tier 1s
- Culture of misogyny not adequately punished in game
- Gamer Houses that do not severely sanction all-male teams that place great difficulties on female presences.
Finally, I would like to point out that the announcement of this “Empowerment Cup” remained obscured for two days without advertising the tournament dates well in advance of February 26 and 27 (now outdated) and only today was it made available for viewing, testimony : user comments. Why doesn’t this happen to the “all-precious” OW League that dares to announce itself even before showing the progress of 5v5? Why was there a decent advance on the EXC cup and not here? You understand that in addition to giving a questionable message about feminism you are also treating it very superficially, as a formality and in which you say to yourself "oh, on the business register it says we did. We tried to. be inclusive, see? ". Well, no … you haven’t given the chance to practically anyone. Nor did you give him exposure in decent time.
other inclusion issues
Oh, but we could also include this in any kind of organizational “marginalization”: European tournaments earning less money than American ones (the latest Flash Ops Experimental cup, for first place: $ 10,000 US vs $ 6,000.
What about in-game chat vocabulary? there are a huge amount of offensive words that can be written about misogyny, racism, geographic offenses (you can imagine these days that happens when there is Cyrillic in chat) and all reports show a frightening amount of monitoring reports from pre-formatted messages. We need a minimum of human monitoring in the study of reports of this type, a more human touch different from cheat reports. THIS already would make the start of being inclusive more credible.