Blizzard you should really do something

Many great games are coming soon and only competitive is worth playing at the moment however it tilts you so hard that its easy to just quit.

Overwatch was my main game for 3 whole years now but thats slowly changing. Nothing has more potential than this game and it would be perfect if it wasn’t for this balanced matchmaking.

5 Likes

What great games? I check the upcoming PC games articles on various websites, and nothing is coming that compares to Overwatch. There are some great games coming yes, but nothing like Overwatch.

Unfortunately you provide no details or examples of what you don’t like about the current Competitive system. I also encourage you to take the time to post what ideas you may have to improve the system.

3 Likes

You mean nothing like the potential of Overwatch. Squandered potential at that.

The devs have been way too passive with competitive fixes for WAY too long, and on top of that the community is chock full of toxic kiddos who neurotically rotate between four accounts and three of those are one-trick throw or smurf accounts.

Competitive Overwatch in its current state is heinously bad, the worst it’s been in seasons (Thanks Humble Bundle). Blizzard is clueless about the incredibly toxic and negative effect alts have on their competitive system, and even before the teeming masses of alts infested matchmaking, it was REALLY struggling with coming up with good matches anyway – at times the SR felt like a suggestion with 1000 point variance. Instead of fixing it, they said “lol the matchmaker seems to be pretty close to good enough, just trust us” and “smurfs aren’t a problem, but we have a WHOLE CREW examining matchmaking stats for boosters.” Meanwhile booster teams with a smurf throwaway have are everywhere, but they’re not PAID boosters, just kids screwing up matchmaking with ez wins so that’s ok.

Why? If there’s one thing that has been proven between competitive, character balance updates, and OWL, is that Blizzard is absolutely arrogant about their game and have NO interest in anything we suggest. Even if they do rarely find merit in points made here, and come down from the mystical tower to acknowledge us plebs, the changes won’t see the light of day for such a period of time that we’ve all forgotten about it because something else unpleasant has reared its head.

Too many missteps lately, on top of the half measures that weren’t actually fixing the nasty pending issues, on top of the constant tilt inducing matchmaking system that honestly could’ve used SOMETHING to decrease the odds of constant blowout losses/wins… and too many good games coming out within the days, weeks, and months between now and the end of the year.

Adios, OW.

5 Likes

i agree. comp matchmaking is complete trash. worst experience ive ever had online. smurfs, alts, and mixing great and terribads is not fun

6 Likes

There is simply no insentive to tryhard and climb. People up the ladder do not become less toxic, just mechanically better represented by a generic number next to their name. Just waiting for BF to release and get some patches so it is playable

4 Likes

red dead 2 soon :slight_smile:

3 Likes

In all seriousness i love overwatch but its pretty safe to say the current state of matchmaking is pretty frustrating. I dont think I’ll stop playing, but man LFG wasnt really the solution. niether is a role cue because some of the fun of intresting team comps is lost. I think the real frustration comes down to the SR system. It would be alot less annoying for alot of people if we could get performanced based rather than win and lose gains only. People freak out and will say somthing like “every one wants a medal for not winning these days” or “then people will play for stats”. Sure fair arguments but people feel like there wasting there time when they lose 4 games in a row and see nothing gained.

I think a combo of giving SR for a win and for performance is the solution. Example + or -20SR for a win and then maybe like a 0 - 30SR given for performance.

in alot of ways the system does this already. like those times you get 5-0SR taken away after a lose. but this would enable those who performed very well to still gain from loses though only marginally.

1 Like

This is good feedback TobysWeed, but unfortunately I rather see less metrics toward performance based SR in all ranks. Right now only a tiny portion of your SR adjustment is influenced by your performance and only if you are in Platinum and lower ranks. Right now I have a pretty good idea of how that works and I am taking advantage of it to the point where it is creating poor quality matches in exchange for me gaining skill rating. I do this by focusing on my best heroes such as Pharah (note this was prior to the patch) and work my individual hero stats to perform above their averages regardless of match result. In effect over a long term I was winning more games, and was gaining more SR with wins versus losing SR with losses. However this sometimes created some rather toxic experiences if I am ever solo queuing. But now, I believe am on track and on my way to a career high by exploiting performance based SR in the Platinum rank.

Ya ive seen people talk about this when there was alot of complaints about boosted off meta one trick players. from what i understand it does alot of guaging of your skill vs other people playing that hero maybe there needs to be an overhaul of the performance system. i do believe given some time the overwatch team could nail down what things players do lead to winning games. a tall order I know. but its 2018 average comapanies have acces to neural nets that can scan huge amounts of information in seconds. i do believe with investment the performance systems gauging of what are important actions could be hugely improved. but what do i know, maybe winning actions in a game are truely to abstract to be given number values. @JeffreyKaplan???

Total random skill level of players at a given Sr.

New players tend to place mid gold, whether they’re actually 500 SR or 4500 Sr in skill. Eg 700 Soldier in Unit Lost video placed 2200 and fell 1500. No game sense. Going in 1v6 all the time. Fed up of losing games due to morons on my team. Placement system needs improving. There’s 25 qp levels as well as 10 games to get it right. I win due to idiots on enemy team, but not really fun or hard fought games.

Leaver problem is massive. Played 3 games today. Leavers in 2 (enemy team luckily). Friend of mine did placements. Leavers on his team in 5 games. There needs to be some form of backfill system in place.

Throwers not punished. Reporting them apparently does nothing. Can’t believe there’s not an algorithm to look at a player, see that he’s dropped 1000 Sr in 3 days playing heroes he’s never touched before. Just perm ban these scumbags.

Better tutorial. Explain grouping up, not feeding. Really basic stuff that people just don’t get.

Mmr matchmaking. What the heck is this garbage? Player A is really good, so we’ll give him some donkeys to carry whilst enemy team also has a carry and some donkeys. Either way, a good player loses and several bad players get carried.
I’ve a friend miles better at this game than me. I was higher Sr than him for a while. I got carried and he got heavy as hell team mates. I see silvers play like plats and plats play like silvers. Skill level is all over the place. Makes many games into stomps due to massive skill variances at a given Sr.
Just match via Sr. Use Mmr only for awarding points to move smurfs up quicker.

Pbsr. I see the point of this. At least make it transparent. Tell someone why they’re getting screwed on gains. I could heal 15k and get 12 rezzes as Mercy for 25 Sr, or play Orisa, do almost nothing and get 28 sr. Utter garbage.

I think that covers a variety of issues…

5 Likes

Right now leavers were kinda common until late today when they patched a certain bug with the game, even then there will never be a backfill as that is considered an unfair change to the team without the leaver.

Don’t worry there is, I get frequent feedback messages for my reports. However I am very discerning to evaluate a player if they are actually throwing by some manner, or if they are just really, really bad.

No automated tutorial system is going to teach players to get better, I know this from years of experience as an arcade technician and have seen it game to game.

First remember that matchmaking rating is based around a single value. Matchmaking only takes that number and uses it to pair players around the same value. Does it work perfectly? No and it never will. Can it improve? Maybe, but it would require rule changes to Competitive. Rule changes that some players may not like.

I just explained above how I use my statistics and work to improve my own personal averages. The only thing better was Pursuit (which is now banned).

I’m just a player what details could I give? We know nothing about ranked system and matchmaker :grin:.
Does it have to an Overwatch clonce I’d like a little change from all the Battle Royal and toxic Competitive.

There is a lot more information out there, one power user here on the forums as it all collected into one comprehensive guide:


To conclude before I retire for the night, I will note I have seen something peculiar in the game that suggests changes might be coming. To give a hint, something is missing that should have now appeared in the game since the patch was updated.

1 Like

how the hell are you gonna be so cryptic now imma be up all night wondering what this ment.

I appreciate your optimism but another mediocre half measure ain’t going to cut it at this point.
Competitive needs something along the lines of an announcement of an entirely revised ranking algorithm, because the competitive experience is as bipolar as it’s ever been right now.

Throwaway wins one game, massive loss the next. Alts everywhere exacerbating the issue by either being outright smurfs, clearly playing at an SR level way below their main, or one-tricking a niche character that is being completely countered while saying “lol don’t care this isn’t my main.”

Last night, the final time I played before BO4 comes out - between 8 games I had 3 games with leavers on my team, 3 games with Symm/Sombra one trick alts way out of their league, and at least 15 players on low level accounts that played nice until overtime rounds and then switched characters to destroy the other team. That’s more bad games than good.

You may say “unlucky matchmaking” but I say “bad matchmaking.” This is two+ years after release and shouldn’t be happening anymore.

I’m sure there’s an excuse involving all the less-practiced players returning for the Halloween event or something, but frankly I don’t care what the excuses are.

The competitive matchmaker is only partially capable on its best days, and the playerbase needs to stop being blamed for its failings, which has been the go-to since the game launched.

1 Like

Huehuehuehuehue! What ever makes you sleep better at night you Silver God. 哈哈哈!

别哭!

Hahahahhahaha one tricks on your, that’s ironic!

你很聪明!

Sad but probably pretty accurate description of things, and also explains the weird variances in games too often.

2 Likes

You probably hard stuck in Silver so you bought a new account to place higher, Sad but probably true. Huehuehuehuehue!

你干什么?

Oh yeah :sunglasses: