Now you’re just waffling. Bringing up random topics to make a whole different argument look better is the very definition of a strawman.
What? So you’re telling me that even when already knowing Jeff’s quote you thought in your head ”HmM ThIs BlOkE DEFinetlY iS saYin tHat JeFf oNce pUt 3Cp iN tHe lIve GAme”
For reference, here’s Jeff’s quote:
I’m not even going to read the rest of this paragraph since I already pointed out that it was an assumption - an educated guess.
My argument is that most pros should be listened to in regards to balance because they are skilful and knowledgable of the game. Let’s make this point A.
You reply to my argument with this:
Let’s consider this point B.
If I say point A and you refute point B, that is a strawman argument. You’re not refuting my original point. Can you please actually look up what a strawman is before being a Grammar pendant?
Tbh, I think I’m done here. You’re clearly not listening to anything that is being said and are now just wasting time. With nothing meaningful being discussed, I’m just going to leave it here. Also, I’m muting this thread so I don’t have to reply to it again. Think that’s best for both of us. Good day.