You haven’t tried my bowl of rice.
The secret to good fried rice is is fish sauce. Get some lime juice on there too.
1 Like
Soy sauce, fish sauce, a dash of sesame oil, and yup some acid. I use lime juice sometimes, but I prefer rice vinegar. It adds that acidity and a splash of sweetness.
1 Like
you are sad sad little man
2 Likes
Here’s a YouTuber talking about the same thing with EA. Their algorithms are nearly identical to the Activision patents revealed by Cuthbert. All these big corps share data and information with each other to make their games as addicting as possible, giving them constant revenue stream from addicted gamers. Modern ranked systems are designed to be addicting, not fair.
Anyone defending this crap is an idiot and the reason these corps will get away with this for many years to come, because stupid people can’t wrap their heads around what’s really going on and they’d rather defend an unfair ranked system to make themselves feel better about their 2000 hour grind and rank achieved than look at the facts.
2 Likes
Tried to read the post you linked but holy moly it’s like a fricken novel, I don’t say it often but seriously tldr, try making your point more succinctly.
You don’t have to read the whole thing. The point is expressed in the first 500 words, with all information arranged in descending order of importance. So read that, or watch the video.
According to Forbes, it is true that 95 percent of patents fail to be licensed or commercialized. But that statistic is about patents belonging to owners (licensors) who are different from the person or company that wants to implement the patent (licensee).
In this case, Activision Publishing Incorporated is both the licensor and the licensee. And they registered their Matchmaker patent in the same year that they released the Alpha of Overwatch. It is overwhelmingly unlikely that Activision’s Matchmaker patent was not implemented in Overwatch, based on the facts you are ignoring.
1 Like
This bit is simply untrue. People have been making this argument for decades. But assuming that patents are implemented at all let alone in any given product is not the high percentage choice. Most patents that are implemented by any given company are not employed in any given product produced by that company. That is what we know.
Assuming that a particular patent, in this case, is being utilized in Overwatch is not a high percentage assumption to make. The likelihood is that the assumption is false.
My man Tales still out here doing gods work.
- You’ve done your community a great service.
1 Like
it still amusing me that one video where he said his team deserves a lower rank while he deserves a higher one, while we’re literally watching his gameplay lol.
5 Likes
Nobody said that. You are making it up because you’re a liar.
In the youtube video they did, so shhh.
Maybe try watching it, before you call me a liar ty.
Got the timestamp for you
“they weren’t meant to play with me in the first place. They were destined for lower ranks, Just as I was destined for higher ones”
4 Likes
looks like one of Cuthberts alts joined the forums
5 Likes
What in tarnation am I watching lol. At first I was like “ok, ok”
but then it all fell apart, quickly.
The list of things I see in the first 2 minutes alone… he absolutely belongs where he is.
His poor team… can’t track, no flank awareness, roughly .5 damage a minute…
3 Likes
he still thinks he was a gm level player at worst btw and that there are players who play worse than that yet are still deserving of gm/T500
2 Likes
I’d put him low - mid plat. If that. If even close.
Maybe he is or is not wrong about the matchmaker, but ultimately he should not use himself as evidence. Ever.
1 Like
He hasn’t played in 4 years and my favorite quote of his…
What a champ!
2 Likes
I had hoped he just hadn’t updated his profile.
I barely play Rein/tank and I’m on track to have better performance… and that performance still isn’t good.
1 Like
Not that how good he is matters to the context of his opinion. A bronze player could have a truthful point.
That post is evidence of his ego and how illogical he is which does debunk his opinion and as he has 0 evidence on his point it’s worthless.
I’ve discussed with him before and pretty much proved he doesn’t understand what algorythimic handicapping is.
How he does data manipulation.
Even shown him to misquote devs which is basically lying.
It is interesting to talk to him though but like he said…
Shows how much of a point he has. Honestly almost all his issues were addressed in 2016 or 2017 dev posts it’s just when someone doesn’t understand the definition of the words he uses he can’t see how they relate.
2 Likes