https://thefreshtoast.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/bbc-new-meme-hood-documentary-1068x580.jpg
1 Like
So much this. It’s like zombies are using the forum. Repeating the same thing over and over.
1 Like
No. It breaks fun it makes enemy team surrender when they are losing shorting your victory, less time in winning matches more in lost ones. It is the most fun breaking thing in league of legends it would be even more here, especialy for someone like me who played nasus there and mostly stacking heroes here.
its toxic people saying if we dont surr i do nothing…
i never surrendered in lol and it was a sh*t show.
Instead of Surrender I would rather put WLP (weakest link person) available only if someone is disconnected at the end of SL - last season I had 4 matches in row when at least one team member disconnects in storm league. It is literally reducing team power by 20%. WLP would be available only for loosing team - and if WLP person is chosen it would receive half of each team person penatly for losing and penalty for no gold and exp next winning match. For argument that trolls would stay or feed to increase process I answer: They wouldn’t as they would increase their penalty much more. Lets say Toxic player stayed in Hall of Storms stopped feeding - 400 exp for loosing for each team member? -200 goes away from each team member and additiona; -800 go to him, he still feeds - 500 exp for loosing for each team member -250 goes away from each team member additional - 1000 go to him.
No its not. This isn’t league. People in the game don’t understand it enough to correctly surrender. When do I surrender ? what is the trigger ? Adding a surrender will add toxicity and will become a self fulfilling prophecy. If the vote goes against them they will quit playing hard just to prove or punish the people that didn’t vote their way.
This game UNLIKE LEAGUE, has a TON of comeback mechanics as have been listed over and over, the team behind gets more xp for kills than the team ahead, the death timers are longer for the teams ahead. If you can get 1 fort down then then you have a late game win condition where if you can get a late team wipe take the keep in the short lane and possibly push core. Late game you are NEVER more than 1 or 2 teamfight wins from winning thats why getting 1 fort down before 20 is so important.
Or at least put it only in QM.
yes if players is afk from 1 min should be free to leave .
These threads need to stop.
2 Likes
yes im tierd of enemy bulling you for 20 min .
Just stop playing, they do not wanna add good features and fix there game so dont support it.
no. 
the solution to leavers and disconnectors is harsher punishments, not ruining games by shoving a surrender option into them, prompting “SURRENDER VOTE INITIATED” after every lost team fight.
What is wrong if 5 people decide that game is lost at min 10 or 15 and have an option to forfeit? Its so much better to have 5 people on fountain as an or its so much better to have enemies prolong games so they can get 20 and you are still on 17, so you are basically the punching balls. Dont get me wrong I played many more games I was in the winning side of the match by 3 or even 4 levels, it was fun sure but I felt pity for the enemies. You should give option at least on ranked so no one is wasting time.
the problem is it’s almost never that simple. it’s usually 1-2 losers who are determined to lose cuz reasons, so let’s initiate a surrender vote after everything that goes bad. no thanks.
Easily solved if you cant surrender for the next 5 mins
so the guy who wants to surrender starts raging at everyone who voted no, and he chooses to perform worse than ever in order to prove that the game was lost and the team should have surrendered. something like that is about 1000x more likely to happen than what you describe, 5 people nicely deciding unanimously together that the game is over and there’s no hope of winning.
How many games you won after someone non stop flamed and called it a lost game?
I won less than 10% is a state of mentality you can do nothing to change.
plenty. what you do is mute them (and probably report for abusive chat) and play the game. what you don’t do is exacerbate the problem by forcing everyone to vote on whether or not the game is over, encouraging others to start typing and arguing instead of playing and getting a comeback.
you remember them because it was an epic comeback, Statistically speaking you win 10-20% of these games if the person who flames or cries is at the same rank at you. I will not even speak about lower ranks during smurfing sure whole team can flame and you can still win.
This is an oxymoron
1 Like