What your saying makes perfect sense to me. I just run into a problem.
I have a pretty low wr with Garrosh which might be due to what you’re saying. However, even though he’s probably a more technically played hero, I feel more comfortable with his kit than other tanks (Varian, Mura, Diablo, and Garry). I have a sub 50% wr with Varian, Mura and Garrosh while sitting at a 52% wr with Diablo. I don’t always go tank Varian but idk how to see which build of Varian I am most successful with personally so idk if Taunt Varian is statistically successful or not. Diablo is probably only higher because I pick him more often when I feel like he can be most useful. He’s not my go-to tank. Picking him on Volskaya sucks for me because its so open and hard for me to consistently bang enemies into walls vs a map like Infernal Shrines or something. In ranked recently if I am going to be flexing into the tank role my first pick preference is Garrosh, then Varian, then Mura and only Diablo if I like the map or comp.
I might be wrong in this but I feel like the displacement and lockdown Garrosh provides and the fact he can be pretty tanky due to his armor can still be valuable even if the enemy assassins aren’t consistently proficient enough to blow up who ever I can single out. I don’t know exactly what my losses with Garrosh are caused by but that’s why I still pick him most of the time. I think its better for my team in general if I’m playing a tank I’m comfortable with vs playing a tank I’m not as comfortable with. It might also mean I just need to learn more tanks but that’s a whole other thing.