Even if you do not post it here, I really do encourage you to check your comps from several months ago, and you will likely find equally bizarre match ups on a regular basis. If for no other reason, to get some solid evidence behind your claims, rather than emotional speculation.
I know my match ups.
I do not need advice from someone who seems to think inference is some kind of fallacy lol.
Bye dude
The thing is, we do not know them. Please post them so we can see for ourselves that you are truly being persecuted by the match maker recently, rather than it being some form of retroactive justification. This would make your argument far more compelling, and I assume that convincing people you are correct is the point of starting this thread in the first place, no?
That is where you are mistaken.
You cant prove anything by inference. That would be the fallacy. The only fallacy here is your assumption I am trying to PROVE something to you or anyone.
So please. bye
Um. OK.
And your OP was making recommendations on how to “fix” QM, with the implication that something was changed recently. Without proof that there is an actual change, suggesting fixes is fairly premature. So whether or not you are trying to prove something, proof is a critical element in the process of implementing changes.
2 Likes
See this is where I have to assume you are just a confused person or trolling and I dont care which tbh because the results the same.
You flood a post I made with your confusion and waste my time.
My only statement was that the match would have been more fair with that change.
You can disagree with that or not IDC.
I said I
So again, I said I was INFERING something was off.
and to infer requires no proof. Its an inference. It goes on all the time and is ok to do. In fact, the entirety of particle physics anymore is being built on inference and pure math without any evidence.
So please bye. Stop knocking on my door on my thread.
If you disagree with my inference, than ok, but that doesnt make the inference wrong just like I cant say my inference is right and never had.
Actually, you were wildly speculating. An inference is based on a history of behavior, being compared to previous behavior. For example, since every time I drop an object it falls to the floor, I can infer that future drops will end up on the floor, not the ceiling. What you have done is taken an isolated incident and built a unevidenced theory from that.
Providing the history of your match ups would then turn this into inference.
“IT’S MA’AM!” Made my day. 
2 Likes
See my inference is based on my history.
What you are asking me to do is go through trouble of detailing my experience so you can critique it like you are some measure that I care about.
I dont.
You may be self important, but not important to me in the slight.
So your statement is again wrong. I have made an inference based on many matches the last few days.
Your belief in that does not interest me in the slightest.
The thing is, memory is incredibly fallible, and is subject to errors, such as confirmation bias. You may believe that your history supports your inference, but as I have demonstrated, that may not be the actual truth.
I do find it somewhat curious as to why you are unwilling to back up your claims with actual data.
I know you do.
And I am telling you that your desire to have someone do that for you is likely motivated by a feeling of self importance and not the topic itself. You want to see someone jump through hoops to try and persuade you, but ultimately I dont care.
If it wasnt, you would have stopped responding a long time ago and just come to the conclusion you do not believe me and walked away.
Not really, it is based more on seeing well-constructed arguments for or against changes. Changes based on emotional reactions rarely end well, which is why so many otherwise fine heroes get nerfed to the point of near-uselessness.
If the point of this thread was not to convince the general audience that there is a problem, and you have a solution, then all anyone can assume is that it is yet another pointless rant.
Which is fine, I guess.
yet i never asked for a hero nerf or hero change so now you are making stuff up to support why you have been ranting.
You are asking for a broad-based change to one of the most popular modes without considering the unintended consequences of such a change. Personally, I see that as more detrimental to the game as a whole than a nerf to a hero.
The nerf thing was an example of where your type of argumentation can lead.
1 Like
again making stuff up. where did I ask for a broad based change? I said the match comp would have been more balanced had they swapped 1 heroe for another within the same match.
and that I FELT like it was happening more the last week.
I see your made up example as you trying to dig around and find why you are motivated to rant for so long as anything other than what I INFER it to be motivated by.
i think you guys are just on different pages regarding what this thread is. hoku (and others) have read it as a suggestion thread, but from what OP is saying, it was only supposed to be a complain thread
i do wonder what the point is if there’s not mean to be a suggestion here, but eh, i guess complain threads will always happen
1 Like
In your OP.
This comes across as asking for changes to how the match-maker currently works, as that is the thing you are scapegoating for your loss.
That is certainly what it is turning into.
1 Like
It was a thread to point out a mismatch, and to say I felt like it was happening a lot more lately.
I certainly didnt. Swapping one hero out is not a BROAD change. Its a simple change. Again you have to overstate.
See this is why i think you are just trolling.
You are prodding at me and suggesting I am some idiot who “umadbro” after a game and made a thread to vent.
Trolling is a simpleton activity.
This would require a broad change to the matchmaker, as there are a number of elements of a team comp that would have to be accounted for. Wave clear, single-target damage, AoE damage, siege potential, CC, self-sustain, burst mitigation, peel, and more. Swapping out a hero to make completely fair comps is not so simple when you examine it objectively, rather than subjectively as you have been.
This is why almost every time this particular complaint comes up, the best answer really is, “Play draft”, even though none of the complainers ever seem to accept that.
It ALREADY does this.
If you played QM much and level heroes you would have already noticed it pairs certain heroes with others.
But had you already known what you were talking about before entering my thread, this wouldnt be an issue for you.