Youâre just spouting confirmation bias and using bad perceptenges to act like you read something that you havenât
At the end of the post, youâre still doing the thing I described you were doing, trying to revel in ignorance, and not understanding the correlation of people that donât understand something finding themselves in situations that theyâre frustrated by their own [lack[ of knowledge.
However, so long as they have something else to blame, they will refuse to learn, to adapt, and to do better.
I mean, take your catch phrase to heart here: A âdoubt mongerâ
If my position is that people are frustrated as a consequence of their own ignorance, and theyâre demonstrably ignorant on something, then they should doubt their knowledge and look to learn something more.
However, you havenât even bothered to think through your own gripe and just wear this pathetic attempt at an insult/label like itâs a badge of honor because you havenât thought through the implications of what youâre trying to even convey.
Youâre just disagreeing because you donât know any better, refuse to read more to find out otherwise, and have so narrow a perspective on the outcomes at hand, that you just wallow yourself in a bad sense of pride because youâre not going to put in the effort to have a different out come.
You were predicted long before you replied to me, and you donât have the integrity to read otherwise. And so long as you have anything else to blame, youâll keep on keeping on.
Consider this: of all the stuff Iâve written, you just repeat yourself despite reading little to any of it. Human processing would demand some sort of change to different stimuli, but you treat it all the same. On the other hand, Iâve rephrased different particulars, addressed different points, and actually shown an active involvement in an attempt at âdiscussionâ
If you want to be worry about âfailureâ here, then you might want to reconsider that a written medium means this stuff lasts; you can go back and actually inform yourself accordingly at any point instead of replying with impulse and assumption.
To note: at no point in any of this have to actually denied any of the conclusions Iâve drawn from your conduct. If I were to assume that youâre being as honest as I am, then youâre inability to deny drawn conclusions from the given evidence pretty much means you agree with it, or at least canât ârefuteâ it, and are only then trying to belittle others to distract from that reality.
But since itâs more likely they you just donât notice those things, youâre really doing yourself a disservice to this forum, the game you play, and pretty much anywhere else you go to carry on that same effectively dishonest conduct.
Iâve already explained how that has been relevant to the game and discussion; itâs on you to stop being liar. However, since you assume youâre ârightâ and that people only disagree out of being âwrongâ, then you project that they have to be dishonest instead. So you rationalize a poor excuse to not read stuff, repeat yourself, and completely cut out how to be a ârationalâ creature.
In a topic wanting âexplanationsâ the ability to get, and understand that stems from being ârationalâ in the first place. So part of my whole âpeople frustrate themselvesâ thesis pretty much comes as a consequence of people trying to claim their irrationality is anything but.
To which, again, if you thought your âcomebackâ through, you should actually doubt such ignorance, laziness, dishonestly, and automated gainsay because those are qualities that just lead to people frustrating themselves.
But at best youâre going to be all âHa, see, i called it rightâ and then miss the entirety of what I wrote because thatâs what youâve been doing this whole time and missed the boat on how that shows you to be wrong.
Which, as you should note, simply couldnât actually be the case despite the above posts by other not-Xenterex exchanges going on demonstrate that the riles some of these people take with the matching (for this topic) actually do stem from assumption and bad conclusions from incomplete information.
So even without my posts, the âproofâ is there that these sort of attitudes donât work, were âprovenâ wrong, and were predicted to do that well before you decided repeating yourself was a better use of your time than just reading this stuff through the first time.
Iâm âverboseâ because Iâll put in the time to actually try to explain this stuff out. Thatâs just another bad claim youâve made, was proven wrong before you even made it, and youâre still not going to bother to think through âwhyâ
And thatâs on you.
