My qualm with the up and coming class redesign

Like I said, it was a few years ago the last time I looked, so I am not surprised I got it wrong. However, your is still more complex than it needs to be for HotS.

No. It’s not burst if you can shield/bubble/heal through some/most/all of it. It’s the exact opposite of burst. The fact that it can be very heavy damage at times (e.g. - Naz late game with 175+ stacks) is irrelevant.

Then i do not see why he shouldn’t be matched with heroes good at laning who are mostly in the bruiser category.

Picking Alarak and being matched vs all those melee + sonya+ thrall+xul+dva was so balanced before that he got a matchmaking rule. why revert it when it was an issue before?

facepalm

They’d still be mages. You’re not using Naz or Guldan to autoattack anyone.

Bruiser, melee and ranged has all Heroes that are good at laning. He’ll probably be put against Heroes with good laning capabilities. And it’s not like Blaze is a lane bully or something.

Well yes, it is the biggest role. But is it a real problem?

1 Like

Ideally, the category size wouldn’t matter at all. As far as truly new players are concerned, even categories as basic as tank, healer, bruiser, assassin, and “other” would be enough if there were better descriptions and explanations built into the game. Rather than endlessly dividing up the heroes, I would much rather see resources put into teaching people how and when to use them.

2 Likes

Is any of this a ‘real’ problem? Like Hoku said, descriptions and explanations are enough anyway. Hell, if we want to be really nuanced about this, DOTA has only 3 classes (strength, speed, and intelligence). We’ll all learn eventually, but the current system for assassins is too broad, which is my entire point.

Most of the melee assassins are just assassins. You could literally move Tracer, Genji, and Nova over to it and be fine. I think a split between those who are good at auto-attacking from a backline would be a good separator too (you know, like literally every other moba does).

For what?

Well for one, to break up the ‘ranged assassin’ category into something more meaningful then “they have ranged auto-attacks”.

Secondly, because I feel a ranged DPS has a completely different role on the field. All the ranged DPS I mentioned (save for Cassia and Tychus, who are more nuanced) have the same role as marksman would in other game. Mages are a little more complicated, but I feel separating them into heroes that deal heavy ability damage and have weak auto attacks is a good way to define them.

There are mixing and matching, yes. Junkrat has the awkward position of do you classify him as a dps (because his auto attacks do hit pretty hard) or a mage (because he does draw the bulk of his damage from abilities). However, I ultimately feel a uniform on this will help break up the massive class into something a little more helpful.

I just wish that instead of Melee Assassin/Ranged Assassin, they split them into Assassin and Mage for ‘mostly physical damage’ and ‘mostly spell damage’. Would be a lot of more useful in my opinion.

1 Like

i would just add role bruiser and it would cotain assassin bruisers(thrall,rag,…) warrior bruisers(sonya,…) and specialist bruiser (xul, gazlowe)

I’d be fine with this, honestly. I like the 3 categories because I feel that encompasses every facet of the game classifications, but I’d be fine with that distinction. The term ‘ranged assassin’ just seems so arbitrary because they’re judged by their auto-attack and not what they’re bringing to the fight.

They did try forcing comp on QM (the only mode that this categorization would make sense). But the result is a much longer queue time. So they disabled it. Now you would want to make it even more complicated? And for no good reason to boost.

It’s the player’s responsibility to come up with counters to fight against the odds that were put in front of them. The thrill of overcoming such challenge is the greatest reward they are looking for. Otherwise, even in mirror match, they would still complaint that the MM was rigged to put them at disadvantage.

https://heroesofthestorm.gamepedia.com/Ranged_Assassin

It’s simple and effective. Then if you enter the page you will see what those heroes do and what is their specialty. And they said they would have a description in game too. I think that’s enough for new players to understand what they are playing.

2 Likes

Sooo by this logic, Raynor and Li-Ming can fulfill the same role.

Wait…

Also, Ataraxia, this has nothing to do with QM… outside of maybe changing daily quests. I’m not talking matchmaking, I’m talking about the up and coming class redesign.

Yes, actually. They fullfill the ranged assassin role. Now, if you want to see what they do in that role, you will look at the description that says one is a sustained dps and the other is a high burst agressive mage. I see no problem with that at all. We don’t need to go into really specific roles as long as the role we have already describes how the hero is played in general.

roles should be:
Tanks: high HP that can peel and could solo tank at least a little.
Bruiser: heroes like sonya who have good hp and survivability but can’t protect the team.
Marksman: Ranged auto attackers.
Mage: ranged attackers who use spells as their main damage source.
Assasin: melee damage dealers, especially heroes that dive, like zeratul.
Healer: people who heal.
Support: people who help the team with things other then blunt healing, like tassadar and tlv

1 Like

And then I would argue what’s the point of the class system to begin with? They could have really just gotten rid of specialists and called it a day. Saying someone is a ‘ranged assassin’ signifies nothing about what they can do other than their auto attack is at a range.

The gameplay difference between several as these are as stark as the difference between a tank and a bruiser. Why, then, do we need to distinguish between Artanis and Diablo, but need no distinction between Raynor and Li-Ming?

1 Like

Following your logic we should also have new roles for tanks. Dive tanks, meat shield tanks and counter engage tanks. We could also have roles for bruisers because they all don’t play the same. Let’s do it with healers too, sustained healers and burst healers. We could also make new roles for supports, melee assassins and so on.

The new role system is meant to just put the heroes in the role that better suit the overall role without being too specific. A lot of heroes could fit different roles too, and that is the reason they will put them in the most suitable role and use sub roles in the description to explain a bit more of that hero.

1 Like