It means one goal of a matching would be ‘fun’ matches. He also mentions there are different goals, for different ends, for different types of games. The leading caveat of that ‘goal’ is that [they] don’t know what “fun” actually is, but they can try to approach it be removing parts of what it “isn’t”.
There’s also the sections on how to on-paper fix certain issues, but not to fix the perception issues from those ends of the game. Given that this topic, and some of your demands for ‘proof’ stem from problems of player perception, you may have overlooked the part of the video that’s more pertinent.
Given how you keep trying to use this video in particular ways, have a disconnected sense of how you engage with other discussions, and then try to continue to cherry-pick select lines to try to have a point without much by way of
a) establishing context
b) providing commentary to emphasize a particular bit in a different topic
c) properly summarize the concerns because it shouldn’t take 1 hour for someone to dissect 1 sentence.
Of what I have seen of your contributions, you seem rather negligent on any of those, presume you are already “right” about something, and then demand others “prove a negative” about your cherry-picked sampling.
So, it’s a fat stack of fallacy on top of fallacy on top of a fallacy, then you magically feel better/empowered for it?
This smells like half-baked imitation to the point you aren’t actually even sure what is being conveyed, but it suits the authority of what you claim to want, therefore you support it. And then it’s on anyone else to sort through that mess to actually tell if it matters, applies, or is pertinent.
So… this smells more like anti-contribution in that it fixates on a red herring, doesn’t apply coherent thoughts to its attempts, and doesn’t have the courtesy to care to do otherwise.
I mean, yea, if you think something positive out of that, then sure “confirmation bias” because apparently you’ve learned how to see those two particular words, but… you don’t seem to know what they do, why they’re bad, or why you keep doing it. Which is pretty much the summary of your post history, fixation on that video, and why apparently you’d want to hide profile so it’s not as easy if someone wanted to point out how many times you’ve done that, keep doing that, and apparently don’t learn much from it despite demanding other people do so from the air of authority that is your linked vid.
But hey, ignoring context makes everything better, right 