Nice one, I never saw your reply so hat’s off to you for advancing the conversation.
I had looked at it briefly and saw that matchups followed the general trend.
I don’t necessarily agree with your conclusion that a ~2% variance is indicative of rigging based on deck type (it’s certainly not indicative of widespread rigging and I would argue it actually rules it out), mainly because your post was light on detail, but hopefully some of the data nerds here with more free time will take a closer look.
I see you put forward an opinion that it’s to make more fun games, but that opinion is also unsupported (where were the 2% of matches reallocated?), at least in your post.
Appreciate that you put in some effort, and sorry I missed it 