It’s like those Titans, they got bold font in the text as a keyword, but not minion types.
It’s quite weird, isn’t it?
Keywords describe a feature of a minion, and such feature needs a paragraph to explain.
Both Titan and Starship are really better understood as a minion type by the name of it.
I think it’s a bad practice to call them Titan or Starship when naming the keyword.
A better way is to call the feature by the feature, for example:
Instead of Titan, call it “casting” or “spell bearing”,
Instead of Starship Piece, call it “assembling” or “parts”.
Just avoid using a minion type to label a keyword.
Having a keyword is not what type means. There are a lot of keywords. Elusive, for example. “Taunt minion” just means “minion with Taunt on the original card.” There is no typing beyond that.
taunt rush spell damage and deathrattle all have at least one card for support to draw /resurrect / change cost /buff stats (only mentioned charge because of the meme nerf) they have support arent those "supported minion types "?
pieces have exodar but they need more …i hoping for a tutor on the mini set
That doesn’t make the others a type. The group you are referring to doesn’t exist, it could expand or contract based on what cards are legal in the format.
If the cards that reference taunt minions rotate out, are taunt minions no longer a type?
I think Mechs are supposed to be machines that have the ability to move of their own accord. The starships aren’t “alive” and need something else to make them move.
Similar to why Ship’s Cannon isn’t a mech, it’s a device that needs something else to operate it.