Why battlegrounds was rigged

After doing a data analysis on 1200 battlegrounds matches, multiple patterns consistencies in the data have been found, enough not just to suggest this mode is rigged, but to accurately predict the outcome of the match before it even starts.

Gathering data in this mode was initially a major challenge due to the time constraints of each turn, so i ended up taking screenshots of each turn to enter the results into a spreadsheet later. This may seem ridiculous, but i do data analytics for a living, and so this is just part of who i am.

After having discovered the patent owned by activation, i became less interested in the game, and more interested in the challenge of finding the applied usage in hearthstone.

Compared to the previous analysis in arena, the findings in battlegrounds are far more consistent, they were lazy when it came to masking the methodology here.

If i had to guess, the patent was deployed in this mode at the directive of someone in a leadership role in order to provide a level of satisfaction to later be reported to upper management.

In other words, there’s no monetary advantage to rigging battlegrounds, but they did it anyway to make it look like a job well done to the higher corporate heads.

Initial Findings

The rigging effects 3 various factors of the match.

  • Who you’ll be matched against
  • Card selection
    -Minion attack pattern

Similar to the system deployed in arena post 2021, this system utilizes a gambit-like tagging system which “tags” various players based on their current win/loss%

You may experience altered gameplay in none, one, two, or all 3 of the functions listed above, depending on your win/loss%.

Who you’ll be matched against

This tag represents the likelihood of being matched against a favored opponent after turn 1. Each match is divided into 2 groups of 4, you’ll only be matched against the 3 other opponents in your group until the first 2 players are eliminated. Within this group, you’ll be matched against favored/unfavored opponents who are tagged with favored or unfavored versions of gambit #2 and gambit #3 based on your win/loss%

Card selection

This ones straightforward and easy to identify as an all or nothing tag. A big giveaway were the few instances of a 3-of-a-kind appearing upon refresh, which led to a game of generally favorable matches within the players current tavern tier.

Favored=multiple matches and matching minion types of your current tavern tier
Unfavored = nearly zero matches of your current tavern tier, most if not all matches will be of a lower tavern tier only

Minion attack pattern

This was the final tag to be identified and the most difficult to verify. The initial finding occurred when comparing the attack patterns in games with an avenge minion present. But it doesn’t stop there. The favored side of this gambit will also find that their minions are mathamatically sound in their attack patterns, meaning that 40/1 minion won’t be finished off by a 1/1 anytime soon, and will instead be more likely to clash with a healthier minion E.G 40/40.

As for how these tags are determined based on win/loss%, that’s the special secret sauce i’ll keep to myself, for now.

7 Likes

What a load of nonsense.

7 Likes

Excelent work. Ty for helping unravel the mystery that has been puzzling so many of us.

1 Like

You missed april fool’s day by a few days. :frowning:

Maybe next year.

7 Likes

Fantastic!

Link the data set, please.

8 Likes

Sounds like an entirely worthless pursuit, chasing nothing whatsoever mixed with conspiracy theories.

I hope you grow up and do something more useful with your life.

3 Likes

The mode is complete trash, play ANY other Blizzard game besides Hearthstone and you’ll actually have fun.

1 Like

For every matchup that is a counter there is a player on the other side of that matchup that is the opposite of countered. Blizzard doesn’t care which of those sides you fall on.

1 Like

It’s so fun to watch all of the Blizzard defenders come out and be toxic to whoever doesn’t fall into line.

1 Like

We are slowly but steadily moving towards a society that has virtually zero tollerance for people who have a different opinion.

Its kinda sad. The world is getting better in many ways but also moving backwards in a few ways.

6 Likes

I mean, that’s what I predict I’ll be doing, but I’d rather actually, you know, READ that wall of text before judging it. What I suspect is that pretty much everyone else in the thread, on both “sides,” is reacting according to their biases and haven’t read the opening post with their critical thinking brain on.

3 Likes

I want you to know that I absolutely tolerate you. Moreover, I would fight for your right to believe ridiculously stupid stuff. It’s not as if you’re not a person.

What I do have is zero acceptance of stupid stuff. Acceptance and tolerance are different things.

6 Likes

Alright, let’s see it

Cool. Link?

Ooook. Pretttttttty strange

How of you find that from screenshots?

How did you define that? Suppose the game is at it start, and 2 players are out. How did you’d define they were or not in your group? I’m interested in how that data goes.

How did this comparison go? At which winning % did the effects kick in?

I’m not buying this without seeing the work, sorry. Seem like a lot of claims for no data. There’s no risk at all involved in sharing the spreadsheet.

3 Likes

No, we have always been a society that has zero tolerance for people who make up lies and claim it’s an opinion.

3 Likes

The First amendment called. It said that it has tolerance for your made-up lie that you claim is an opinion.

It was a general remark. Not aimed at this discussion.
It is a very worrying trend that has accelerated in recent years. Increase in polarization and a decrease in tollerance for the opposite side. You see this in many different areas,not only in national politics.

Probably a result of the increasing individualisation of society. Which can be atributed mostly to social media bubbles.

1 Like

There’s a lot of these posts lately and this was the most thought out one in a while. However, it’s no different than any other conspiracy theory post given the fact there is zero posting of the data you’re claiming making it nothing more than a claim. When are y’all crazies going to understand, without proof, this is all hearsay. With proof, this post has legs, but instead it’s a bloated corpse dead on arrival.

1 Like

Hey, I lived that 5 times in a row, like I have a hero power and minion that needs to be killed in order for main to gain a gigantic advantage for the rest of the game, and of course I match A.F Kay and this freaking Lich.

Same when I play minion stealing hero power, I only match the worst minions ever invented in Battlegrounds, and the only time I match the interesting minion, it’s end game and I get violently killed.

It made me so mad.

What’s up with silly pyramad and the useless mushroom buddy. Am I missing something?

My guess is that this post was created by an alt of scrottie. In an attempt to bring the discussion back to life. And as bait to see how others would react to it.

But maybe i am beeing paranoid here.