its a holy spell, the only one in warlock
Please reread the name of the spell.
ok i have read it, now what?
The name is exactly why it is holy.
You’re renouncing the darkness.
correct, and now what?
we all understand its a holy spell
would anyone like to talk about it?
Holy cow! A holy spell in warlock!
I actually had no idea it was holy, so thanks for pointing it out!
That makes the flavour of the card even more interesting.
Well it’s certainly an interesting card. It’s very meme-y and rarely useful, but it’s definitely interesting.
Warlocks aren’t really known for renouncing their ways, but I really like the concept of the card, both flavor wise and in terms of its actual effect.
My favorite effects are the ones that are super unique like this, even if a lot of the times, they aren’t really competitive.
Perhaps you could share why you made a thread about it?
Yeah, I also need help in trying to understand the purpose.
A warlock with the option to “turn good” would definitely do so with a Holy Spell and not a shadow spell.
Priest has exactly 1 fire spell and exactly 1 nature spell as well…so if the purpose is that a class has 1 spell in 1 spell school, that’s not unheard of.
i thought it was interesting, may be a fun topic
Based on what?
All you said was Warlock has access to a Holy spell.
Your point being?
Maybe actually make it fun, instead of posting random comments without any context as to your point.
if you dont want the topic to be here, why reply?
If you want discussion, maybe give something more than just “Warlock has a holy spell in it arsenal”.
You gave nothing in regards to your intention for the direction you wanted this “thread” to take…
All you did is state warlock has access to a holy card.
Your point is?!?
you
you are the point
discussion was to be had, and so it is
No discussion has been had, because you presented no TOPIC to discuss!
You only stated common knowledge, and left it at that.
So, if you want an actual discussion to happen. maybe be less cryptic and state what you want that discussion to be, because all you have stated is common knowledge. You dont need to create a thread pointing out the obvious.
But are you not fulfilling the requirement yourself? How can you say there is not discussion when cleary there be.
What discussion?
Calling out the lack of discussion initiated is not a discussion, its stating the obvious.
No direction was given by the OP. Just a generic comment, which was obvious.
Should I start a thread about Warrior having a fire spell?
I mean, seriously, this is the OP:
in its entirety. There is nothing to discuss in there, just him poinitng out the obvious!
Do they only have 1?
What is the relevance of how many?
What is the point of discussion?
This is the OP:
Nothing to discuss.
This thread has no point, so I will treat it as such.
Its a useless thread, and I will show it the respect it deserves.
Shouldn’t you have done that to begin with?