The “multiplayer discussion” tag is sort of on the nose here, but please Blizzard, consider “nerfing” Time Warp with the new (once per game) mechanic, so we can be free of our Mage overlords in Wild.
Thank you!
4 Likes
I wouldn’t characterize mage as the overlords, since they only have one deck, but maybe if they nerf time warp, mage could have something else reverted, so I’m with you.
2 Likes
Hey, Mallenroh made an alt, since so many people blocked him! Welcome back buddy!
1 Like
Anyone with knowledge please share.
Is there a punctuation to add between warp and mage to imply pause. Read it wrong first time and wondering.
apologies for punctuation? 
Now there is confusion.
I am just wondering if that’s the correct way to type that out.
I wonder if there is a way to imply the pause needed to make the sentence coherent.
First time reading it was …
because it seems like a continuation of the first part.
I was wondering if a comma or something would be appropriate if one were to know.
And you edited it, I take it a comma is correct usage then?
That is the way I intended it. But typing isn’t a strong skill set for me.
I think that if Time Warp were nerfed, then Team 5 might be incentivized to restore another deck style for mage in Wild.
2 Likes
Agreed. It would allow for more versatility in the class.
At least the include of the text (Once per game) in the new card Harth Stonebrew gives hope of it becoming actually true.
Happy days if that were to truly happen!
1 Like
Time Warp is fine. A deck being popular is not a reason for a deck to be nerfed, especially in Wild.
1 Like
That’s not the point that OP made, though.
Maybe overlords implied popularity, but the intention is overlords of annoyance and lack of interaction.
1 Like
I would argue that it isn’t popular as much as it is the only viable thing mage has in wild.
If you doubt that, try yourself.
I have played in Wild almost exclusively since at least 2018/19, and since the Secret nerf, Time Warp is all that can be played to legend by average players, imo.
Just give it a few more expansion at most and it will get nerfed.
1 Like
God, I hope you’re right. It is way past time mage had something in wild besides that one deck.
Well I don’t know why you would think if Time Warp Mage gets nerfed that they’d make up for it by making another Mage deck playable. Some classes don’t have any playable decks in Wild and they haven’t done anything about it.
1 Like
you’re probably right.
If the intention was to imply pause, it’s the wrong use, but it was done correctly. Any sentence starting with “IF” is a conditional clause of the sentence, generally preceding the main clause. It sets the condition of the main clause.
In this case, he has set the condition “Time Warp is nerfed” which would lead to the mage having a revert to one of their other cards. Now, he could re-order them with the main clause coming first, but no comma is needed.
- English Major
P.S. “that” wasn’t needed in the sentence of a couple comments down. It’s not bad grammar, but he would have accomplished more clarity or better flow without it. Just my opinion, of course.
1 Like
Man seriously complained about wild , wild is wild anything goes
1 Like
not true. Team5 has seen fit to nerf cards that select people complained about.
Team 5 has taken action against specific polarizing cards due to people even more whiny than you. I guarantee they absolutely do not care about the balance of wild outside of satiating a few oddballs here and there, since it’s wildly unprofitable
Impossible! This is misinformation 