This has to be the first nerf? Lab Constructor

Multiplayer Discussion
1

every time I have seen it it just snowballs, you have no answer for both copies, 1 becomes 2, 2 become 4 and they just keep getting more magnetics, more stats more duplicates

it’s going to bring starfish back into meta

2

Sounds like your opponent built a board while you were busy not advancing your board state.

1 Like
3

god are you that oblivious ?

rogue has the magnetic duplicating minion, they also have a stealth minion you can not target, they can also cheat all this stuff out early game?

like I had a rogue game where I cleared every single minion upto the point the mech that deathrattle summons an 8/8 game out

I controled the board for 8 turns , didn;'t have an anyser for thins one mech ? you know what happened /???

MAGNETICMAGNETICMAGNETICMAGNETICMAGNETIC

I took 19 to the face and it summoned a copy of itself

LOLLOL

I gUeSs I sHoUld hAvE cOnTrOlLeD tHe bOaRd bEtTeR!! , mY bAd :rofl: bhahah

7 Likes
4

Maybe it’s time to add Starfish to your deck?

5

already did, you’re late to the party dude, we had the issue last meta that stuff that is too good that makes fish auto include is probably bad for the game

3 Likes
6

in your opinion, yes, but I disagree with that. Starfish is there for a reason.

7

right and when a card becomes auto include because another thing is a problem then it’s bad for the game.

6 Likes
8

So, you are a control deck. Whats your win condition, control the opponent until fatigue?

9

This is one of the stupidest things I’ve ever read.

10

What does make me sad is that whenever people start auto including silence, blizz usually nerfs the silence source.

1 Like
11

why would you assume I am control ? also you’re so negative!

I heard streamers complain about starfish being autoinclude in the naga expansion, not my words! take it up with them

this guy gets it

12

I don’t know why they made this astral automaton after how much people enjoyed rez priest because this is just rez priest repackaged.

2 Likes
13

You know I think Mage will get the first nerf then to others. As much I hate to regret it, but everyone seems to consciously hate mage whenever it gets a decent card.

1 Like
14

First off, there’s no such thing as “autoinclude.” There’s including and there’s not including, and all you’re doing is adding a prefix because you think it adds something when it doesn’t.

Second, if Starfish is not strong enough to be included in decks, then it serves no purpose.

15

That is exactly why I quit playing ranked/constructed and played only BG for two years.
Blizz would insta nerf anything Mage but would always come back with the “working as intended” for any other broken class/combo/card.
I don’t know about the last two years, but previously, and this past month I was playing if you checked any of the “deck list” sites you’d have to go pages deep before finding a mage deck.
Mage has always been the redheaded step child of HS. The moment there was a “good combo” or card everyone would complain and it would get beat TFU with the ban hammer. Complain about any other class/combo/card…crickets

2 Likes
16

You’re the one making a topic complaining about your opponent’s deck, but not saying what deck you are playing. All you’ve said about your own plays is how you controlled your opponent, but it wasn’t enough.

So either tell us what garbage deck you are playing that loses to a meme deck, or stop complaining. Making a topic about something means nothing if you don’t tell us what that deck is beating.

17

your augment falls flat when you are picking on language, you are a smart guy you know language can be emphasized for effect?

ofc you include it or you don’t but if something (for example before your stat picking on these numbers xD) gives you a 60% winrate when played then its probably a great idea to put it in your deck.

wrong, blizzard have often talked in the past that they do print some bad cards on purpose, the “rager” cards for example, some meme cards too fit into this exact category, cards don’t have to be strong enough to be included in decks to have a purpose. smarter people than us have talked in length about this.

you already you assumed my deck and used that assumption to bash on my feedback, bad kind of negative response.

I am submitting feedback about mechanics I observed that feel bad to me, I seen the magnetic that summons a copy at the end of turn several times and it always snowball s, I wouldn’t be surprised if they change it to start of turn to give players a turn to answer it.

I will give you some other feedback, too many decks including the ones I play setup unbeatable boardstates, its just buildup to something that can’t be answered and I think thats an issue too! so I am not just directing feedback at things “that beat me” xD

18

And they haven’t had to do much because they finally realized that making mage marginally relevant in good hands puts it right where it should be in play rates - about 10%. It’s become likely the easiest class to balance now… it’s just not quite good enough and it’s there for flavor. The hard core wizard hat wearing folks play it, everyone else is fine.

19

Sounds like a skill issue

2 Likes
20

looks like a troll issue xD edit:I saw a great meme on reddit about should have played around a turn 3 stealth minion lolol