Boba, here’s how I view what you are doing: you are going to a text that, to any rational reader, directly refutes your entire position, you are pulling direct quotes from that text, and you are saying that it proves you correct. Then, to add insult to injury, you demand that the people trying to talk sense to you admit that they are liars.
I find your behavior both completely irrational and utterly contemptible. How about we agree to disagree, we end the conversation, and you stop putting words in people’s mouths. I don’t care if you consider that a win or not.
when the clear wording of it proves you were being intentionally dishonest:
“While aspects of the invention may be described herein with reference to various game levels or modes, characters, roles, game items, etc. associated with a First-Person-Shooter (FPS) game, it should be appreciated that any such examples are for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to be limiting. The matchmaking system and method described in detail herein may be used in any genre of multiplayer video game, without limitation”
Doesn’t begin to describe how many times you spammed that lie in this thread alone.
How many times have you had exactly this response? Do you really think that psychological projection is that common? I mean, I understand that it’s common, but it’s not as common as breathing. It seems to me that if you’re labeling so many criticisms as projection that that might actually be cope on your part.
There is a ((very) small) chance that I could be wrong. There is no chance whatsoever that I’m lying. Unacceptable behavior.
Do you understand that trying to prove that someone is a liar is against the code of conduct even if, by some miracle, you happened to be correct? There is no “I’m right, so the code of conduct doesn’t apply” clause.
You’re not right, by the way. You’re just behaving unacceptably.
Bobafett continues to school the children ITT. At this point it’s just pathetic. People will employ extreme mental gymnastics to convince themselves they are right.
Amazing how far people will go to avoid admitting being wrong! Sad!
Feel free to post where. Because if that’s the case:
that among the subsequent posts and several others would count as well.
And not just this thread either. So you’d have to get several of your posts as well.
And then directly contradicting yourself with:
Explain to everyone how this:
“While aspects of the invention may be described herein with reference to various game levels or modes, characters, roles, game items, etc. associated with a First-Person-Shooter (FPS) game, it should be appreciated that any such examples are for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to be limiting. The matchmaking system and method described in detail herein may be used in any genre of multiplayer video game, without limitation”
somehow means it’s a cod patent. The non deniers in the thread will wait.
The problem is partially blizzard for releasing untested, overpowered or clearly broken mechanics in nearly every release then never fixing them. On the other hand, it is partially the fault of players for rushing like lemmings to play those broken builds.
Alternatively, it isn’t on blizz that every warrior i fight is playing the same deck, every DK is playing the same copy pasta deck, or every warlock. It’s incredibly tedious and dull but nobody is forcing the lemmings to do this or to spend $$ acquiring them, they have a choice. I don’t even have to explain those builds and everyone here already knows what cards are in those decks.
Then there is the horrible algorithm. After fighting the same DK deck 12 times in a row the system will throw a completely new player at me who has no cards. While the game isn’t actually pay to win like some here incessantly claim, actual time playing the game matters and I’ve been playing pretty much since release and there is no reason new players should ever be paired against me.
So are you saying that any scenario that you can conceive under the patent, and that you can argue makes money, is implemented? Or is it just this particular scenario of yours?
It’s already been shown many times that the matchmaking is rigged. It’s how they achieve as close to 50% win/loss as possible (notwithstanding their own balance issues and a infinitesimally small amount of player skill determination)
The MMR system is not a conspiracy: it’s a known official fact openly discussed by the Devs. If you keep winning: you WILL lose very likely after a point because you start getting opponents on your own skill (the only exception is if you are Legend 1 material and no better player exist online (good luck with that)).
The conspiracy theory that the DECK matching is doctored also exists; I’m an agnostic on that because the code is a black box; since that’s more easily (partly) debunked I’m more agnostic about my own conspiracy theory that what opponent-MMR you get might be doctored (but that’s also unlikely).