Come on don’t go showing favoritism now.
Doesn’t this classify under “mah interaction” the same way TW did? Why didn’t it get nerfed like mage?
Go ahead Team 5. Show your impartiality.
2 Likes
I wonder how Blizzard decided upon the term “player agency”. It really seems to have convinced many players that there was a light at the end of the tunnel that isn’t the actual destination, but sounds good. I don’t, and don’t think anyone should, have faith in this company. How many supposed #pulltheripcord type movements can Blizzard claim to be taking up in the spirit of saving itself under the guise of enhancing player experience.
Like a former president once said, “There’s an old saying in Tennessee — I know it’s in Texas, probably in Tennessee — that says, fool me once, shame on — shame on you. Fool me — you can’t get fooled again.”
1 Like
we all knew profesional complainers were going to start demading to "once per game " to be slapped on any card they lost to…
2 Likes
Either go all the way or leave it alone.
They caused this situation. It’s time to show backbone.
2 Likes
The most optimistic scenario I’ve read is that we’re going to be in the middle of a circus for some time due to cards being designed in advance. They’re trying to work backwards having realized they broke the game. We may ultimately reach a more desirable equilibrium, but it will take time (time Hearthstone hopefully has).
1 Like
I am not a fan of Shudderwock or cards like it.
It feels like they have nerfed the thing so many times in its life, and still it causes complaints.
1 Like
You could always try adding Mutanus to your deck. Players will likely not play around it since it’s an old card and a legendary.
2 Likes
If they’d remove the 1 turn of 50 hours of Shudderwock board animation i’d at least tolerate it lol
2 Likes