On one hand the deck isn’t topping out the charts on wins. It gets beat by aggressive decks most of the time, and can be inconsistent most other times.
On the other hand, does anyone look at their opponent playing warrior and think “This game is going to be fun”? Is anyone honestly thinking the game will be interesting at all when playing against Warrior?
So should the deck be hit just because its not fun to play against. Its not really fun to play either(don’t lie we all know its a flow chart). So why not hit the deck, let it die, and then rebuild a more interactive deck?
Honestly yes, and mostly because if all the new Whizbang toys get nerfed (Paladin, Hunter, Window Shopper) then people will just run back to Odyn Warrior. I mean shoot, it’s already happening, since it beats all the strong/popular new archetypes except the occasional Wheel of Death highroll.
Warrior got way too much in TITANS and Badlands. Incredible control tools, excellent draw cards and synergies, and one of the best win conditions ever printed for any class. It even armors up out of OTK Shaman range. Of course it does well in any meta.
Pretty much all of the buffs to the TITANS cards need to be reverted. And even then they’d still have Aftershocks, Needlerock Totem, Badlands Brawler, buffed Blast Charge, and new Acolyte of Pain + Bladestorm. And Reno.
I think the fact they have so much removal (which is fine) coupled with the ability to kill you without having to outlast you is just crazy. Personally it should be one or the other.
I want to say yes, but Odyn warrior can be easily beat (the amount of times I’ve used dirty rat pulling Odyn onto the field almost always equals instant rage quit) Plus brann is easily stopped by plague dk. So idk. If a nerf has to happen, maybe limit the amount of attack per armor Odyn allows, or make brann’s effect only work for like the first two minions per turn. But even that would cripple those decks (and I play warrior) so idk
Idk it’s pretty fun to me to stack up 5 sludges on the bottom and fire a surprising 25 dmg to his face when he thought he was safe with 10 hp and 15 armor
Top 1000 control warrior has a 60%(give or take) win rate. Maybe you lose 50%+ of your games, but the top players are winning 60% of theirs. And I trust their meta more then some rando crying cause warrior might deserve a nerf for once since its return.
Edit:
Control Warrior is the meta list btw, not highlander. Nobody is playing Brann
Yeah, I was going to say that the combo-ish version of Odyn Warrior should be nerfed lightly but Brann Warrior is not a problem and shouldn’t be nerfed. You’re definitely exaggerating about 60% wr but it’s a tier 1 deck.
Oh no, 55% when your saying it loses 50%+ of is games. I wonder who is right here. Me saying its too strong(backed up by top players), or you saying its bad cause you keep losing with it.
No one saying warrior needs nerfs but noobz using mech rogues. Any other decks dosent lose that much since you can clear the warrior before Odyn appears.
I gotta ask if we are playing the same meta, good warrior players dominate with this deck and them hit ya with a 40 plus dmg otk at the end.
Good warrior players will keep track of sludges and know when 25 from that 5 mana spell is incoming, of course there maybe nothing they can do about it.