Only 3 nerfs needed

currently don’t bother with standard it’s a mess I do play rogue and other classes lately.

I wouldn’t be surprised if Pen Flinger sees no change, honestly. We already thought we would see a nerf but instead they nerfed Nitro Poison.

Far Watch Post 1/4 and its fair

1 Like

How about 3-cost? And rare. And reduce the cost of the 5-mana post.

Here are the nerfs that are needed.

Deck of Lunacy up to 6 mana cost
Refreshing Spring Water down to only refreshing 1 mana per spell drawn
Sword of the Fallen down to 2 durability.
Pen Flinger to 2 mana 2/2

1 Like

If I was just gonna do 3 I’d go with:

Deck of Lunacy - Either 4 mana or spells that cost 1 more instead of 3
Sword of the Fallen - 2 durability
Pen Flinger - 2 mana

I don’t care how badly it kills those cards

1 Like

Deck of Lunacy will likely be transform spells cost 2 more
Watch Post will likely go from 2 mana 2/4 to 2/3
Pen Flinger to only hit minions

Like we’ve seen in the past, despite the dominance of Paladin, probably zero nerfs to them directly except for Pen Flinger. Instead, they nerf other things in hopes that other decks rise to try to topple Paladin.

Deck of Lunacy needs to be a meme. You’re not turning it into a meme by making it turn all 7 cost spells into Librams of Hope.

Deck of Lunacy transforms spells into 1-3+ cost spells is much more appropriate and will please Yogg.

2 Likes

I think that paladin needs one more thing. Something has to be touch in the libram package. Maybe even first day of school might need a nerf.

Also Deck of Lunacy, needs a stronger nerf

Yeah. I also think that chaging the attack would be better than the HP

1 Like

Tick to 3 (x2 with redra) plus 6 for Alter is still over 1/3 of a deck milled with no hard counter now that only Warlock is the only one that can add back to their card count. Tick effect to 4 and “this effect can only be used once per game”

Definitely not. It’s fine as is. Why am I not shocked so many people are crying about it when it’s NEARLY what would be the equivalent to Tick but for aggro. It’s basically a pseudo taunt that when played on turn 1 can demolish a lot of an entire archetype’s game plan. The only thing it’s really missing is that it be guaranteed to be in hand at start of game or some sort of deathrattle that increases the cost of all cards in hand by 1 and it would be pretty much on par with him.

Did you reply to the wrong post? And how am I crying, tell me.

Same way people said any complaint about Tickatus was people crying. Greedy aggro decks just need to deal with a 2/4 for 2 that can’t attack.

Firstly, “people said” doesn’t make something true. And I am not defending anything. Are you okay? That’s why I asked if you replied to the right person.

You LITERALLY are calling for nerfs to a watch post. I said no it doesn’t need nerfs. Unless you advocated for nerfs to Tick all along, you have no place to call for nerfs to watch post.

Quote as to where I said this, please.

Sorry what? You’re literally saying increase the cost and rarity.

How would that possibly apply to Far Watch Post, which you think I am asking to be nerfed? That’s regarding the 5-cost post that no one uses because it sucks. I was suggesting its cost and stats be reduced. That’s not a nerf.

You can stop lying. You’re LITERALLY replying to someone saying turn it from a 2/4 into a 1/4 by saying make it 3 cost and reduce the cost of the other one…you know the one that aggro doesn’t care about. Just stop. Either YOU replied to the wrong person when you wrote that or you’re now lying when confronted with facts.