You’re outraged but are wrong. And this is why you cannot quote me saying the Far Watch Post should be nerfed. I am asking for Crossroads Watch Post to be buffed in someway so it actually sees play. That’s all. Relax.
Why would I lie if I believed the Far Watch Post should be nerfed? I’d say so.
I am 100% correct. I quoted you replying to someone about it. Stop lying. You are now trolling and lying. He literally replied to someone saying Far watch Post saying make it a 1/4. You replied saying make it cost 3 and reduce the cost of the 5 cost(there isn’t a 5 so you mean the 4 cost). So admit you were either mistaken in your reply or you are now lying for whatever god awful trollish reason.
Did I say I agreed with that person about it? I was replying to the person when he mentioned the Crossroads Watch Post.
Please quote who mentioned it.
I think we can all agree with the Deck of Lunecy nerf however gutting any other cards in spell Mage is where i draw the line .
Mage should be allowed to have a solid tier 2 deck because thats all it is without Lunecy.
Stop trying to push your bias against Mage and have a whole archetype destroyed over 1 nonsense card that needs to go.
You’re correct, I sincerely apologize. I do believe you to be overreacting, wouldn’t you say? I suggested it cost 3 mana. You’re freaking about that and me misremembering posting that. Woah.
From my experience, I believe the Far Watch Post to be okay as it is. I haven’t had much success with it myself. So, I take back what I said and do not believe it needs to be nerfed.
Are you happy or still angry?
I think you did a reply to the wrong person.
I might have but it really doesn’t matter. The guy went bonkers over really nothing. But, I guess it’s a touchy subject for some people.
No I’m not overreacting because, shocker, on simply browsing you were actually exactly the stance I expected in another thread. You didn’t misremember because you asked me to link it and I did and you continued to lie about it.
Whatever you say, bud. A lie is when someone intentionally tells an untruth.
No, nobody in this thread mentioned any watch post other than far watch post. So either it’s senility of some sort or when confronted on this being essentially the version of Tickatus that I’ve been saying would have aggro screaming for nerfs he just tried to back out of it.
He’s claiming I went bonkers for calling him out on hypocrisy. People hate this card because it is a relatively strong counter to aggro like Tickatus is to control. Most other decks can actually ignore far watch post.
You’re overreacting because I misremembered posting something. I admitted I was wrong. You’re falsely calling me a liar and, yes, are freaking out over nothing.
Lmao leave me out of this i dont even know whats going on .
He quoted me suggesting a nerf to Far Watch Post (that it cost 3 mana). I forgot I posted this. He attacked me for posting this. I said I didn’t, because I forgot. He was outraged, and began calling me a liar for forgetting I posted something. I admitted I was wrong, did post it, and that my post was wrong. He won’t let it go.
For some reason people have convinced themselves that DoL should only be a meme card. Not sure why. They use these rampant hyperbole of getting so many hits of Nagrand Slam when the odds of that aren’t that great. There are far more cases of cards that the deck won’t even be able to use like Idol and Guardians. Much less they bring up SotF like it matters without actually developing a board as the only way you’re making real use of it is with a full hand of minions and a full board which is basically a win more condition. Hell 7 mana pyro at end game is a lot more of a concern than Nagrand Slam. If anything, water needs to be “if both are spells refresh 3” as a nerf.
Ohhhhh “attacked” instead of calling you out on hypocrisy… shocker. The only one seemingly mad and outraged is you. The only one attacking people is you.
3 nerfs are not enough.
These changes are not that obvious (for now) because the meta is all Mages and Paladins…but believe me is crucial.
You are misusing the word hypocrisy. I guess you’re going with that because calling me a liar didn’t stick?
Calling you a liar did stick. You said you never claimed something. I presented evidence twice that you did and you finally admitted you lied by saying “oh I forgot” even though I linked it. I’m guessing while not getting the word liar and its meaning you also don’t seem to understand hypocrisy as the only real deck type impacted by Far Watch Post is “greedy aggro” much like people claimed Tickatus only affects “greedy control” so complaining about FWP while condoning and arguing in defense of Tickatus is in fact hypocritical.
But hey go read up on a few definitions like “lie”, “outrage”, etc since you seem to not really understand quite a few of the words used here.
Lying is to say something incorrect intentionally. I did not. I misremembered posting something. As for being a hypocrite, you’re wrong. I took back what I said, first of all, about the Far Watch Post. Secondly, as for Tickatus, we can agree to disagree but don’t pretend your opinion on the matter of Tickatus is somehow fact. In that regard, we simply disagree.
As for this conversation, I’m done. You’re a very toxic person.