Granted I don’t want to sit here to look up card names, because it’s just the art alone now that gets me, but I am rather fed up of Brann Warrior. This has gotten old. A deck that stomps all long decks, and has enough control, draw, and only -now- using its Excevate package after summon a 4-mana 8-mana-token has some coy play because it summons auto board.
I’m sorry, I don’t care, nor want to hear “Well only after X cards were introduced is Y viable”. Y’know that does mean Boomboss wasn’t viable until Miniset, Dr Boom is only Viable only thanks to Brann, and Zilliax’s form to copy itself doesn’t matter its cost so long Brann has been triggered.
Then they added Marin to the mix.
That’s 10-mana 6/6 body that draws 3, mana cheat. Or 10 mana 6/6 body, legendary token and generation.
Also why the living !@#$ is Zarog’s scamming right now?
- The card text is lying. It is supposed to summon 2 legendaries, not also add a copy to the hand.
But y’know, why do I rant here, vent here. This doesn’t really turn into discussion other than “Just get good” or “Deal with it” because people either play the deck, they share “I just out aggro it”, or give their unhelpful insight of “The deck I used to beat Boom warrior was”.
Good for you but the MMR algorithm doesn’t mean I can play their counter and only face that deck.
Eh, whatever. “Bring Steamcleaner back” would be nice, but then Excavate DK would take a hit. I’m done. Complaint over. Thank you for your time.
Still wondering how people are so scared of that deck
1 Like
Annoyance and fear are two different things my friend. I’m just sick of it. The TNT should chain off each other; let it destroy itself.
Take the power away from bombboss. He’s not that scary once you have a plan. What I wait until they use bomboss, then I simply play Tony king of pirates and switch to their deck. Works every time and I make sure I saved my important card from my own deck so that I can go all in once Boomboss is no longer a threat.
1 Like
This is kinda what I mean with the last thing I said, no rude intentions but good for you but the MMR algorithm doesn’t mean I can just keep Tony in all my decks to hope for the best.
Have you ever heard of this wonderful card called ETC? lol. It literally gives you the opportunity to store three cards. Keep Tony as one of those cards so when you need him you can use him.
1 Like
They need to take a look at Handlock too it is ridiculously overpowered
1 Like
I had a thought of a new tech card that could be introduced. It would be something along the lines of a 5 cost neutral with the text: “If your opponent’s deck started without any duplicates, destroy their 3 highest cost cards (where ever they may be).”
Stats dont really matter so fill in the blanks there to your amusement.
Ruins their Reno, most likely their Brann, and whatever else.
Its over soon.
Theorycrafting streams featuring druids spending 45 mana, drawing infinite cards while clearing the board and dealing 200 damage from hand turn 6.
I kind like this tech idea, except that this tech card should be more general, so get rid of the “without duplicates” qualifier. They should separate it into 2 cards, where 1 destroys the 3 highest-cost spells, and the other destroys the 3 highest cost minions. And I guess add weapons and locations.
However, I am not sure what you mean by “where ever they may be”, because stuff like discover is random.
Its a tech card to ruin highlander decks, so the “deck started without duplicates” is a non negotiable. you are just thinking of something else entirely with your choose one druid type card. Since this thread is about Brann Warrior, my idea of a tech card is tailor-made to answer such an archetype. People running a Brann Warrior would have to load their decks with 3 high cost cards to dilute the effects of the card I suggested. Thus making them less effective. Also the “where ever they may be” is meant to make the 3 highest cost cards in their deck, or hand, get destroyed. So if they already had Brann and Reno in their hand when this is played, they still go poof. The only other way to circumvent this tech card i suggest is to hide everything like reno and Brann inside of ETC. But then youve gotta make a choice of only getting 1 out you need, or put in other cards that let you bounce ETC back to hand to let it go off again, which is again diluting their deck.
I see that anger is clouding your judgement. I hate Boomboss as much as the next guy and the expansion is going to give some strong tools for Warrior BUT…
- Warrior has WR 50.1% against DK
- Warrior has WR 49,8% against Druid
- Warrior has WR 45,8% against Priest
- Warrior has WR 60,5% against Shaman
(all data according to d0nkey).
So Brann Warrior is “a deck that is being stomped on by Priest, has even matchups against Druid and DK and stomps on Shaman” should be a fairer assessment than the one you provided. In other words Brann Warrior is on par with other control decks in the meta.
I still think that Boomboss is too swingy but the deck is fine even if it can be annoying.
And I don’t know what Marin has to do with anything. Every class can play him.
Brann should have been your excavate cards trigger twice.
Then it would still provide value but not this degeneracy. Could be even 4-5 mana.
Why whine about deck with rank 7 in win rate chart ?
Druid beats it easily, it’s almost a free win