Some of those who post use the textbook definition of rigged as you stated, but many use the word to express strong feelings about the fairness of matchmaking.
I mean sure, I prefer to call dogs cats and cats dogs but the reality is dogs are dogs and cats are cats and if the world revolved around my preferences that are wrong weād all be lost.
I have no real interest in being accurate to ramblings.
If you think thereās an all encompassing matchmaker that:
-
Analyzes deck win rates
-
Match decks with counters as appropriate (thus poisoning itās own data)
-
Manages to do that while players go in and out of sessions, change cards, change classes, and still matches everyone in those 10 or so seconds
-
Simultaneously can be beaten by luck (thus further poisoning itās own already poisoned data)
-
Simultaneously can be beaten by skill (more poisoned data)
You just zigzagged between Blizzard being competent, incompetent, competent, and incompetent again, without even touching on the technical aspects of it.
Check history, find who are the people who have logically contradicting worldviews with persecutory undertones, and then come back to reality, where you already do a good job of making yourself look foolish
4 Likes
If a player plays worse than almost all players online, Blizzard canāt do much about it; theoretically they could try to match them by waiting more but waiting for multiple minutes is probably worse; and itās not a rare scenario to play worse than most online for a few reasons.
It reminds me of the reverse scenario; a player who goes Legend 1 (or CAN go Legend 1) probably plays better than almost everyone online; Blizzard canāt completely prevent them winning >>50%.
Are you seriously claiming that there is some debate as to whether something that is ādeceptive or dishonestā is fair or not?
Because that would be absurd.
1 Like
Arenāt you people tired of talking about the same thing, yet again?
How many times must this thread be madeā¦
1 Like
As long as people refuse to accept responsibility for their own performance.
5 Likes
Why would I take accountability when I can take pills? 
1 Like
And as long as people refuse to accept how little their performance matters in regards to the outcomes
Dang it! Iāve wasted my life
1 Like
1 Like
And all the people who are at the top 100 Rank every single month is just pure coincidence. And how some people manage to make it into the master tournaments over and over and over again. Yeah, another coincidence of course.
Great theory you have there.
3 Likes
Itās not absurd at all. They mean cases like you live in a Dictatorship and you go against the dictator with deceptive means.
Not saying Blizzard is doing anything like that though (just talking about it theoretically (thatās what SuperCuddles did)).
And this is how you know itās still āNeverluckyā, and not some chinese hacker stealing his account
What was the post about (itās deleted)?
1 Like
Whatever it was, it was so bad that the mods literally removed it and possibly banned him. Even his āpost deleted by authorā is gone. Wow.
I wonder if the forum removes automatically the ādeletedā.
It does, after a while.
No, it doesnāt.
You can search and see posts deleted by author that have been around for ages and never go away.
For example this is 7 months old:
And neverlucky had theirs removed within a day
1 Like
So much for the narrative that theres no moderation on the weekends, i always miss the juicy stuff sadly.
Between this and the lighting fast action moderation on Mall i better not see any more bs about the mods dont do anything here lol.