As if I would bother calculating them for you. Indeed, why even bother talking to you at all? You invalidated yourself. Begone.
Factually, as in literally, I have in no way, shape, or form, ever asked anyone to “trust” me. I’ve never even stated that my questions are facts. I leave that up to the ever so “friendly and open to discussion” team of lawyers that show up to every one of these posts.
It’s not just the fact that you all show up, every single time, it’s that you show up with giant sarcasm filled nukes that reek of “haha look another crazy person”.
Meanwhile, tavern buffing minions have been bugged for over a week with nobody seeming concerned. Instead of just buffing minions in the tavern, they’re buffing minions FROM the tavern, even the ones already on your board, but no it’s clear they know exactly what they’re doing at all times and would never do anything to impact the games integrity.
Show me where I said something was rigged, because you assuming built in mechanics that change the chance of something happening equates to rigging, therefore cannot exist, is nonsense. They outright stated that certain anomalies have a higher chance of occurring (not just the new ones having a higher chance) and certain heroes have decreased or no chance of appearing with some anomalies. Why is it so outlandish to consider the idea that these mechanics or the way they function, are also utilized in the battleground? Would you have me think they just created this when they made anomalies? Do you want me to assume they created Wisdomball without any data or mechanics to support it?
Blizzard has a very long history of masking mechanics and in some cases straight up hiding the mechanics altogether, simply because they felt it would be beneficial to the health of the game. Hearthstone is quite possibly the only Blizzard game that has an active defense squad on the forums none of the devs read, nobody cares about, and has no actual use besides complaining. Just let people complain about arbitrary 1s and 0s if they want.
You’re aware this information is published and was updated as recently as the most recent patch notes from the hotfix, where they banned more heroes from more anomalies?
It isn’t outlandish. What’s outlandish is presenting these ideas as factsd without a shred of evidence to support the claim.
This idea that disagreement on this specific issue constitutes “blizzard defense” is laughable.
I hate anomalies, I hate the design directions of bg, I hate the over powered random crap they think is awesome, I hate runestones, predatory monetizations, and the antiquated, unfair dust economy. I have posted strongly negative opinions on each of these topics… frequently.
but because I won’t sit here an accept that they are rigging draws to screw people over without any evidence to support it, I must be team blizzactisoft?
That sounds like you’re salty at getting diagreed with and rather than own your own short coming you need to attack someone esle.
You don’t like it? Don’t play.
Yes, which is why I used it as an example to show the mechanics are already present in the game.
I have never stated either of these things. I have presented nothing as fact, it’s just assumed that my questions and thoughts on the way the system behaves, must mean that I claim to know for a fact the game is out to get me because I lost. I have never claimed the game picks and chooses people it wants to win, only that the features they implement in an attempt to balance the game are not always transparent and feel like they are more extensive and utilized more often than we’re told.
Transparent to whom? No matter what type of system a game developer uses, most players won’t understand it, at least not without an expert explanation, and probably not even then. Have you ever actually read the ingredients on the side of the box? A lot of times we have no idea what that stuff actually means. Doesn’t mean that they’re lying and it doesn’t mean that they’re not being satisfactorily transparent.
What transparency means in this context is that other experts can check the ingredients on the side of the box and understand. It doesn’t mean that people in general or you specifically can understand. No one has a duty to explain to you the deeper complexities of randomness. Understanding is not the default and it is emphatically not a right. You have to earn it.
That means that your post makes no sense, because you can’t be sure. Or that’s another deal? 
And why do you ignore the dude who provided calculations like he does not exist?