basically it is not worth my time or effort or enjoyment to queue into warrior and wheel of death warlock that I almost instantly concede against warrior and I wait and see if it’s sludgelock, if not i concede to warlock as well. those two decks just are not fun to play against at all atm.
2 Likes
Yeah, Reno Warrior somehow has only 1 bad matchup on the ladder (wheellock, which is a meme deck in top legend, so actually it has 0) and somehow still escaping that nerf xDDD
Zarimi only has 1 bad matchup, DH which is getting nerfed, and everyone knows it’s broken, so I guess we only have around 2 weeks to wait for that to get toned down
Warrior is a problem, though. It’s deceptively counterable, but not really. If he gets his curve, no real deck in the game can beat it (again, there’s one meme deck which can, but it’s unplayable in high ranks - plague DK)
For how long do we want to allow that class to bully the ladder? I wish there was a more interactive class, you know, one without so much removal and armor which can be allowed to dominate for a while
Also it’s straight up bugged.
Safety goggles are coded in a way that they ignore everything - speaker stomper and frost plagues, and still cost 0 if they don’t have any armor, which is broken. I can understand it ignoring speaker stomper’s effect, but I can’t understand why it literally removes a frost plague from the game, as it ignores its’ effect and when you play it the effect doesn’t get transferred to the next card they play, instead it counts as the plague has done its’ job, which it hasn’t.
I’m going to post this in bug section. These little things make the game unplayable. We don’t need such bugs to make a broken class more broken. It’s really not interesting to watch or play warrior games. People were yawning and not watching warrior mirrors on MT this weekend.
I know Blizzard probably cheers for longer games, but longer games are not neccessarily more interesting (quite the contrary). Watching a guy draw cards and gain 120 armor for 30+ minutes and then proceed to slowly fatigue out the opponent doesn’t look like something you look forward to watch or even play, with or against. It’s not like he outplayed his opponent or something, he just went 1st (80% winrate advantage) and hit a better ignis weapon.
I am playing homebrew deck currently at plat.
against demon hunter I have %67 winrate in 9 games.
against warrior I have %20 winrate in 10 games.
against Priest I have %0 winrate in 3 games- 3 time perfect curve filled entire board at turn 3
The rest of the classes I played against I have %100 winrate except the warlock I simply didn’t face any warlock in 56 games!
I prefer Demon Hunter over warrior and priest any time.
Cmon, you know that that’s not a bug. Obviously intentional.
3 Likes
I had pretty good success with aggro beast hunter against warrior, but that deck currently gets deleted by dh so it’s not worth playingbut maybe after tomorrow if warrior will start to dominate which might be the case as it can get the priest?
It’s a hard decision to choose between queueing into one of these terrible decks to play against or endless bots… Great game team 5 
Reno warrior and death warlock are easily dealt with.
In fact those 2 classes are the least broken. DK with plagues you cannot remove and rogue with zillax you cannot remove in 3 turns are really busted.
I actually have a very good win rate with otk shaman vs Reno warrior, probably in the 70s. I’d even go out on a limb and say Reno warrior is an easier matchup than wheel Warlock for otk shaman.
.
That’s because the deck literally does nothing until it gets Brann out and even then it’s almost purely reaction based. So the only threat they have is bomb boss, but it’s super easy to kill them with fizzle snapshot before that ever comes online.
warrior decks have been the least of my concerns to go against, maybe i just havnt faced many good warrior decks, but ive faced plenty of double turn priest and death wheel garbage, and DH… and so forth. warrior doesnt make my complaint list… yet.
Ok
TWENTYCHARACTERSSOIMPORTANT