When you face a player always check the previous player list. and start a report to get the unique identifier for a battle tag!
In one RL example; it is highly unlikely that battle.net user names (not even considering the total amount of duplicates which was the cause of the battle.net user tag unique identifier) could have ever exceeded 719 billion.
But yet users with a tag of say #719abcdefghi exist. When you also watch how fast they play, coupled with when they appear; after X loss streak thatâs designed to keep you at a certain star level, but youâve lost more than required, and suddenly these appear and itâs an automatic win mostly, to bring you back up to the star level wall youâre supposed to be at until youâve lost XX games (all in the essence to convince you âif you just bought another xyz, you might do betterâ) , is just so obvious.
Youâre not fooling anyone Bliz. Well, maybe you are, but not me.
Edit for the nay sayers; Iâve won at least 90% of my games against user with a battle tag unique identifier that is between 12-16 digits long. Do you track that and recognize the patterns when you see it? I do.
I donât think this is true. They did say they were removing bots, but they never said they would never add them back, and we started seeing the blizzard bots again after a couple weeks. Maybe not as many as before but they are there imo.
It was literally in the patch notes. They took out blizz bots from ranked after apprentice ranks.
[Hearthstone] Blizzard Bots have been removed from the Standard ranked ladder. They are now limited to Apprentice (and new/lower-ranked Battlegrounds games), where they will continue to serve their role in smoothing out matchmaking for newer players.
If you see bots, they are not blizzard bots anymore they are Chinese gold farmers. I am 90% certain they did this so their algo can sweep more player bots and it coincided with them having massive monthly ban waves.
Once again. I will note that Blizzard never claimed they would not put them back again later. It is only playerâs assumption that this note meant âforeverâ.
Thanks for the URL, but that part is just wrong. They would know what bots they have employed themselves; itâs their own servers that were running them; they had the IDs of the bots and everything to filter them out.