According to you, or the CoC?
You called it vandalism. It does not meet that threshold.
Your opinion is that it was deliberate. You have not proven intent.
Also? You have demonstrated no damage.
1 Like
The only thing that could be in the wildest stretch of interpreting it as considered to be āvandalismā is from the forums itself. All your posts so far Mountaineer, because you have detracted from the discussion this thread is meant to be about.
This option is available to click when going to flag someoneās post. And your posts meet the criteria of āit is not useful or relevant to the current topic.ā
Also, your claim was just plain wrong.
Exactly so. It might be considered defamatory, but as no damage is demonstrated, and intent cannot be proven, that is the best anyone can claim.
Imma go on amazon and give some items I bought some vandalism by rating them 1 star. Do not Buy this thing! Its Cheap!
1 Like
Judge Judy would throw this claim out in a second.
Itās ok to be incorrect about the way you used the word - nobody is going to bash you. We are your Hearthstone friends. If you misunderstood my intent, itās ok and Iāve explained it. Just let it go man itās fine.
But you do have to prove intent. You have most certainly not.
All of Cancel Culture is vandalism now too. All strikes, all boycotts, heck, even Vegans and Vegetarians could be vandals by engaging in telling others not to eat meat.
1 Like
This perhaps meets the definition of Defamation in a moderators opinion. Idk.
Itās certainly not vandalism.
Were it me, I would change the header, as it seems to bother some so much.
I am a vegan and can tell you most of us are pacifist as opposed to activist. I do suggest that you could try to avoid products from manufacturers who experiment on animals, because thatās something you can do without a hassle, but thatās about all. People who are vegan generally donāt want to talk about it because itās something akin to an atheist conversation with a believer. Eating meat is part of someoneās basic belief system and you just canāt change someoneās basic belief system. If you are an atheist who has argued with a believer, or vice versa, then you know why we donāt like to talk about it.
I was literally getting duplicate commons to epics in my first initial packs even though the only cards I was missing from the old sets were the legendaries. The dupe protection for Caverns was busted.
Duplicate protection only works within rarity divisions.
If you already own all of the Commons available from a particular pack type, you will receive duplicates any time you draw a Common from that pack.
If you already own all of the Rares available from a particular pack type, you will receive duplicates any time you draw a Rare from that pack.
If you already own all of the Epics available from a particular pack type, you will receive duplicates any time you draw a Epic from that pack.
So, duplicate Commons, Rares and even Epics are entirely expected from the new Caverns packs.
You only get a new Epic or Legendary when the packs are set to contain a card of that rarity, and you donāt own everything from that rarity yet.
1 Like
I said on my initial packs. You need to read better. It means I should have been opening the new CoT cards BEFORE I started getting duplicates from the other sets. I donāt know why you repeated the same thing three separate times either ā it was needlessly redundant.
So, you had TWO copies of every Common, Rare, and Epic in every set included in Caverns before you started opening Caverns packs?
During my opening, the only rarity that seemed possibly a little weird were the Commons (though in that case I thought I had a full set before opening any packs, which turned out to be slightly off since I was missing a few GvG and TGT Commons I hadnāt realized I was missing second copies of).
Every other rarity ā Rare through Legendary ā worked exactly as expected, so Iām pretty sure my āproblemsā were just cards I didnāt realize I didnāt have full playable copies of.