Yes, I read. You did not say beast.
This is what you said:
No mention of beast at all.
1 Like
I have won a pretty late game murloc with nerferian removing all divine shield. you read as i am using murloc⌠wow âŚ
Yep, thatâs how it reads to me.
1 Like
sure since you misinterpret what i say. I am saying a board of murloc divine shield is still beatable but you need an equal highroll. I did that once before with a big hydra sniping 3 and poisonous DS amalgam and Maexxna taking care the rest.
âI have won a pretty late game murlocâ
To me that reads that you won a game using murlocs.
You claim itâs a misinterpretation then it seems you need to be clearer in what youâre saying.
1 Like
Murlocs are more like the strategy I think newer players go for and think itâs powerful.
Itâs terribly inconsistent and still heavily relies on the adaptation to give your other murlocs divine shield and/or poison.
Mechs and beasts seem far more superior with Demons doing much better than previous.
Murlocs are now a strong mid game and fall off pretty hard late game.
Something you ainât good too. 1-1 or are you trying to tell me what to type? Being toxic?
Not at all.
You typed something, I read it to mean what it said, you claim I misinterpreted, hence why I suggested you be clearer in what youâre saying so there can be no misinterpretation.
If you want to ignore that and try and twist it into me being supposedly toxic then thatâs your issue, not mine.
You arenât toxic. Just wrong.
2 Likes
My experience with him is that he is very anecdotal and based off only his own experience without considering objectively if something is too strong or weak.
I agree. Before they were pretty difficult to get to late game with.
Even now if you donât get an early Amalgam into Module, you get destroyed by a lot of other builds. Murlocs is the most dependent on Amalgams to reach late game and may need something extra spicy like Megafin or Underbelly Angler after they replace the Nightmare Amalgam with the new 2/2 Amalgam, which I assume comes out in the April expansion.
1 Like
That would be you seeing as youâre claiming I said something that I did not.
underbelly angler sounds BRILLIANT. hahha hopefully its a thing. Murloc really just need luck in mid game to not take too much damage. And your triples in tier 5 must find that megasaur that can give you divine shield to minimise damage take until it turn invincible.
So Blizzard buffed demons and Lord J. Because they are perfectly fine then?
If you were wrong about those, maybe I just think youâre wrong about murlocs because of your anecdote.
1 Like
Once again youâre claiming I said something that I did not.
Initially he say Lord J is good (blizzard buff Lord J)
He said murloc and Demon aint bad (blizzard buff demon and murloc)
So yea, his anecdote so far isnât the most accurate.
1 Like
I was only ever speaking about my own personal experience with the game.
Youâre making it out to be that what I was saying was the absolute truth for everybody when I never, ever made any such claim.
You, however, continue to harass and mock me at every opportunity. Enough is enough. I am filing a support ticket with Blizzard against you.
Youâre making balance arguments based only on personal anecdotes. We arenât making it out to be absolute truth. Youâre just wrong.
Sure but you are the one spreading misinformation to people asking for information and saying I constructive things when people rightfully point out demon and murloc is lacking by saying things like they are okay, I win with them.
Meanwhile I am at trust level 3, you?
Letâs be clear.
Your trust level has nothing to do with the veracity of your claims. Itâs not like if I fact check you being wrong it would drop to 2.
I donât even know my level. But since I am a prick, I am sure itâs probably not 3.