I'm a ssf not mad about group content

By open world, I am talking about multiplayer open world. Most of the games you listed don’t have an open world like that where you don’t need to opt into it. “Solo” games are single player games that are not played with other people and don’t even have the option. There are games that can be played solo, but they are not “Solo” games

And I listed games that have open worlds, both with other players in them and without an option for other players. Like in Elden Ring there are other players running around that can leave you notes; the whole game can be played solo like I play it, but you can also opt in to join others. And then there’s God of War, Hogwarts, and Breath of Wild, completely open world that can only be played solo. Elder Scrolls there’s people all over you can’t get rid of, but the game can be played solo; it was like that in Marvel Heroes and is like that in Lost Ark as well.

I was just responding to the fact you acted like such games don’t exist. They do.

1 Like

Realistically, their isn’t an SSF mode. However, I do play HC and in terms of having the best HC experience, I prefer to play solo because I want to have the most challenging experience. Not to mention, I want to earn my levels and gear myself.

it’s not a meetic website though.
Some people enjoy playing solo and doing break etc… whenever they feel like it, which you can’t in a group.
And the diablo Franchise has always been played mostly by solo players.

Simple as that

1 Like

Go look on steam where it’s listed as a “single player game”

3 Likes

Dont forget the entire Arkham series. Do people not play anything other than games made by Blizzard?

2 Likes

I will wait till it comes out but I really am not too happy with this concept.

1 Like

Then don’t do it there’s nothing forcing you to do it all you miss out on is cosmetics

I don’t like missing out on things. Like I said, I’ll wait till I experience it first but I am not too happy about it atm.

People need to realize that cosmetics do in fact matter. Tons of games are monetized around them for the simple reason that people want them.

I get it. I dont really care about the cosmetics so Im fine with ignoring it. If other people get their rocks off playing it fine. Long as I can progress without it Im cool with it.

1 Like

Not to me they dont and not to many others.

And???
Youre not telling us anything we dont already know. People with fomo issues will do the dungeon for that very reason. Thats on them.

Best believe imma buy all the cosmetics in space marine 2 !! You can tell sabre is excited about their game.

Here…? Absolutely not. Blizzard has zero creativity left and still core features missing a year later.

Wings I can wear while I get bored during a 2 week season? 25$ world of Warcraft garbage recyclables?

No thanks.

Ok, I get it…I may have not been clear enough but I am speaking about a single player game with an open world like D4, persistent and no option of running into other players like an MMO. There are games that can be played solo…but if it has multiplayer features it is not a SOLO game. To me solo is single player.

Maybe trying to hide yourself as a ssf player tells you that its you the one mad at people actually trying to keep the genre in a good shape instead of keep turning into an MMO

If you want to play an MMO, there are plenty of them, no reason to turn an ARPG into one