Face it Blizzard, this is Diablo 3.5

PC General Discussion
1

-The Diablo III aesthetic was better
-There is nothing that has been improved enough for it to be called diablo 4 instead of diablo 3.5

There I said it.

3 Likes
2

Wow. So brave. It’s truly inspiring that you some how could the courage to post the most Luke warm, basic complaints about the game.

I’m truly in awe.

3

It’s 50 years in front of D3… correct, however i personally prefer D4.

Oh, and… thank you rng… always thank rng…

1 Like
4

Wrong,wrong,and wrong
There I said it!

2 Likes
5

The gameplay is fine, but it has really just been moved laterally instead of forward. It also lacks elite art direction. The assets are fine, but the overall aesthetic leaves a lot to be desired. It looks like someone has assembled a bunch of high quality assets with little regard to the gestalt of the visuals.

6

I can’t believe there’s people that actually prefer the overly bright nauseatingly oversaturated cartoony look of D3 SMH

2 Likes
7

Diablo IV: Adventures in Photogrammetry (it’s not just for other studios now)

Why bother painting the Mona Lisa when you can just take a polaroid of Monica Belucci

Hey Joe Biden, for your presidential portrait we are just going to take a picture with some dude’s iphone, it will look a lot more realistic than stupid oil paints and it saves a lot of time too.

8

D4 look and feel for me. Yes, there are obviously D3 elements but I can live with those.

9

the pope commissioned me to paint over the sistine chapel, im just going to print out a bunch of photos of naked body builders and snakes and stuff it will look 1000x better