So the OP has a differing opinion about the game then most of the people responding, that much is obvious, but I see a lot of people trying to argue against an opinion, nothing more.
If we actually break down the post we can see
- Starfield isn’t doing so well, imagine that, another AAA game that comes out unfinished and unpolished, what the OP says is true
– - One could argue Baldur’s Gate was limited in it’s reach, but so is D4. If anything Baldur’s Gate pulled in people who had never played the previous series and even got more people new to the genre to try it out because of all of the hype, but same thing could be argued for D4. However again, OP is not wrong in their assessment.
– - Haven’t personally played Tears of the Kingdom, but I have heard nothing but good things about it, even if it feels more like a sequel, I’ve heard they made some pretty innovative improvements. Still more of an opinion piece.
– - OP then goes on to talk about D4 having issues, and that it’s being worked on, this is absolutely true. Now it may not be within the time frame most of us would like, and we would’ve preferred some of these QoL features to come out sooner, but there’s no denying it’s making changes to the game, slowly.
– - OP gives opinions about certain aspects of the game, nothing wrong with that.
Now one could argue it’s a bit of a fluff piece for Blizzard, but my counter argument would be if you don’t like it, don’t respond to it. If you have constructive criticism and a counter argument sure, but otherwise it’s just as easy to not respond to a post on these forums.